Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add blog post for archiving projects #17484

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

facutuesca
Copy link
Contributor

Guest blog post about project archival

cc @di @woodruffw

@woodruffw woodruffw added the blog Related to the Blog label Jan 22, 2025
description: Projects on PyPI can now be marked as archived.
authors:
- facutuesca
date: 2025-01-23
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For viz: still working on getting the corresponding ToB post finalized.

Support for archival is built on top of the project quarantine feature. Read
more about that feature in [PyPI’s December 2024 blog
post](https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2024-12-30-quarantine/). You can also find
more details about the project archival’s implementation on the Trail of Bits
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add link to blog post here once it's up

Copy link
Member

@miketheman miketheman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice stuff! One suggestion inline, and good to go from my end once the ToB blog link is in.

docs/blog/.authors.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/blog/posts/2025-01-23-archival.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blog Related to the Blog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants