-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
common: add more RSA-PSS algorithm id definitions #9412
Conversation
Breakout from pyca#9405. Signed-off-by: William Woodruff <[email protected]>
// RSA-PSS ASN.1 mask gen algorithms defined under the CA/B Forum BRs. | ||
pub const PSS_SHA256_MASK_GEN_ALG: MaskGenAlgorithm<'_> = MaskGenAlgorithm { | ||
oid: oid::MGF1_OID, | ||
params: PSS_SHA256_HASH_ALG, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
pub const PSS_SHA384_MASK_GEN_ALG: MaskGenAlgorithm<'_> = MaskGenAlgorithm { | ||
oid: oid::MGF1_OID, | ||
params: PSS_SHA384_HASH_ALG, | ||
}; | ||
|
||
pub const PSS_SHA512_MASK_GEN_ALG: MaskGenAlgorithm<'_> = MaskGenAlgorithm { | ||
oid: oid::MGF1_OID, | ||
params: PSS_SHA512_HASH_ALG, | ||
}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NB: No coverage needed since these are just data, but for maximum correctness I could also test these against the exact expected DER encodings supplied by the CABF rules.
@@ -234,6 +234,22 @@ pub const PSS_SHA1_HASH_ALG: AlgorithmIdentifier<'_> = AlgorithmIdentifier { | |||
params: AlgorithmParameters::Sha1(Some(())), | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
// RSA-PSS ASN.1 hash algorithm definitions specified under the CA/B Forum BRs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comment really correct? It's not really defined by CABF, these come from the RFCs, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's right, although CABF doesn't make reference to the RFCs for their definitions of these. Want me to dig them up regardless?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8017 looks like the right RFC, although it doesn't explicitly parametrize these the way CABF does.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, really? I just assumed that these were all natural consequences of how it worked, and didn't need to be explicitly specified (same as SHA1)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, CABF specifies the precise set that can be used (and provides their exact DER encodings as well) -- both are on page 97 of the PDF I linked in the top.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok
This adds hash and mask generation algorithm ID definitions for the three RSA-PSS configurations allowed under the CABF BRs, mirroring the existing definitions for RSA-PSS with SHA-1.
Breakout from #9405.
See
7.1.3.2.1 RSA
in the CABF BRs for this: https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CA-Browser-Forum-BR-v2.0.0.pdf (page 97).