Remove @ from example to fix Documentation CI #719
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Coffeescript function calls are prefixed with an @, which is the same syntax that jsdoc uses for parsing - which meant that it thought the example was empty.
Spiker985
added
bug
confused-Techie
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM!
I detailed further how I broke this over on #707 so thanks a ton for fixing it!
|
Seeing as how no code changes occurred, and the fact that the failed CI is due to a timeout - I'm gonna go ahead and merge this. Thanks @confused-Techie |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coffeescript function calls are prefixed with an @, which is the same syntax that jsdoc uses for parsing - which meant that it thought the example was empty.