Add in all wiki articles from now defunct atom #8
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this PR I've added all the old Atom wikis.
I had originally moved this into our old documentation under a special wiki only section, but since we've remapped the entire website, I took this chance to instead group things in a more logical way.
Adding the
autocomplete-plus
data intoinfrastructure
since anyone wanting to write a package forautocomplete+
would likely to expect to find the information there, alongside other documentation about integrating with core features.Since other wiki articles like
ide-java
andatom-languageclient
detailed information more about maintaining a package, I added those to themaintaining-pulsar
section.Lastly, the
github
package wiki doesn't do any of those things, but I do find it a cool nugget of history about the project, so also added it tomaintaining-pulsar
.When I originally checked every single package repo (when I originally had forked all of them to Pulsar) these were the ones I identified as having a wiki, so this PR should constitute every single wiki, and entry that exists in the Atom organization. Since I would very much like to make sure we archive this data, it seems rather reasonable to add it here, more-so in the case of helpful documentation like for
autocomplete+