Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2022. It is now read-only.

🆕 Software Suggestion | AnonAddy.com #1673

Closed
willbrowningme opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 15 comments · Fixed by #1672
Closed

🆕 Software Suggestion | AnonAddy.com #1673

willbrowningme opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 15 comments · Fixed by #1672

Comments

@willbrowningme
Copy link

willbrowningme commented Jan 30, 2020

Basic Information

Name: AnonAddy (short for anonymous email address)
Category: Email
URL: https://anonaddy.com

Description

Open-source anonymous email forwarding. Create unlimited aliases for free.

Features Include:

  • GPG/OpenPGP encryption on forwarded emails
  • Browser extension
  • Custom domains
  • Reply to forwarded emails and send from aliases (paid feature)
  • UUID / Random Word aliases at shared domains
  • API

FAQ: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy#anonymous-email-forwarding
Privacy Policy: https://anonaddy.com/privacy/
Terms: https://anonaddy.com/terms/

Why I am making the suggestion

I believe this service can complement email providers such as Tutanota/Protonmail by allowing users to create a different email alias for each site/service that they use.

If someone is still using a provider such as Gmail they can add their own GPG key to encrypt all forwarded emails and prevent inbox snooping.

My connection with the software

I am the author of this software, working on it full time.

  • [X ] I will keep the issue up-to-date if something I have said changes or I remember a connection with the software.
@nitrohorse
Copy link
Contributor

nitrohorse commented Feb 1, 2020

I only have positive things to say about this service; I think it'd be worth adding to the "Interesting email providers or services under development" section.

@nitrohorse nitrohorse mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2020
3 tasks
@Zcr34
Copy link

Zcr34 commented Feb 1, 2020

Seems to be entirely open source, something I like to see. (confirmation?)

Source Code: https://github.com/anonaddy
Self Hosting Instructions: https://github.com/anonaddy/anonaddy#self-hosting


@willbrowningme How is your project different from SpamGourmet or Enrine.email?

Related to #733 and #1672

@dngray
Copy link
Collaborator

dngray commented Feb 2, 2020

We could put mention of it at the bottom where me mention c0x0.com

@willbrowningme
Copy link
Author

Yes the service is open-source and can be self-hosted (although I need to add to the instructions).

@Zcr34 The ability to add your own GPG key to encrypt all fowarded emails. You can send from aliases (initiate email conversation), I know Erine.email does support this too. You can use aliases at shared domains that are not linked back to you by your username. You can add multiple recipients per alias. API access is available as well as a browser extension. AnonAddy is also all green on hardenize.com.

@dngray
Copy link
Collaborator

dngray commented Feb 2, 2020

Keep in mind all email forwarding must abide by the email criteria or it shall not be listed see #1672 for that, this includes things like MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, DANE verification etc.

@willbrowningme
Copy link
Author

willbrowningme commented Feb 2, 2020

@dngray Thanks, it has MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, DANE, DNSSEC, CAA, PFS, registration on the EFF's STARTTLS-Everywhere list, 2FA (on accounts).

Some more details can be found here - https://anonaddy.com/security/

@dngray
Copy link
Collaborator

dngray commented Feb 2, 2020

@willbrowningme How is your project different from SpamGourmet or Enrine.email?

I meant in regard to these.

@ceptonit
Copy link

ceptonit commented Feb 4, 2020

Have they been audited?

I really like the concept but if there are flaws, one could just read all the emails coming through, isn' it?

@dngray
Copy link
Collaborator

dngray commented Feb 4, 2020

No they haven't but virtually no email provider has.

@ceptonit
Copy link

ceptonit commented Feb 4, 2020

No they haven't but virtually no email provider has.

Protonmail is the only one I know of that has been audited, they get audited every year.

@dngray
Copy link
Collaborator

dngray commented Feb 4, 2020

That's right, ProtonMail was audited by Cyberkov.

@ian-tedesco
Copy link

We could put mention of it at the bottom where me mention c0x0.com

Why mentioning c0x0 if it's closed source when there are other open source alternatives?

@blacklight447
Copy link
Collaborator

To be fair, as its a service, being open source matters a lot less since you cannot be sure that the code they publish is the same code they are running. Open source with services only really matter if you want to self host.

@ian-tedesco
Copy link

To be fair, as its a service, being open source matters a lot less since you cannot be sure that the code they publish is the same code they are running. Open source with services only really matter if you want to self host.

Well, you have the option to self-host with all of them if that's the case, still a feel a lot more safe with open source alternatives and if it's the same I still don't see the problem with recommending the options I mentioned.

@dngray
Copy link
Collaborator

dngray commented Feb 15, 2020

Closing this as it's already been taken care of.

@dngray dngray closed this as completed Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

8 participants