docs: nanoid() schema function

[rintaun]

Describe this PR

Documents the newly added nanoid() function

Changes

• Add nanoid() where cuid()/uuid() are mentioned in relevant contexts

What issue does this fix?

Fixes #4363

[vercel]

@rintaun is attempting to deploy a commit to the Prisma Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[rintaun]

@pimeys @janpio I think I've added the most important bits. Please let me know if I've missed anything!

[janpio]

Note for docs team: Implementation is not finished yet, so not to be merged yet.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated
docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	Jan 11, 2023 at 10:23AM (UTC)

[nikolasburk]

What's the status of the nanoid() implementation? Is it still being worked on or should we close this PR?

[Jolg42]

@nikolasburk I made this PR a draft for now. This is blocked by some work that still needs to happen but is currently not planned, see prisma/prisma#17199 for more details.

[nikolasburk]

I would actually close this one @Jolg42. When we know that nanoid() is coming, we can make a fresh plan for documenting it. (This current PR will be a pain to merge anyways due to the merge conflicts and all the changes that have happened to the content since the PR was opened.)

[janpio]

As written in DM as well, I disagree with this. Someone invested a lot of time and effort to find all the places where this should be documented. At least we should turn this into an issue and link this PR here so there is a chance of this being found again for when we need all these locations.

[Jolg42]

@janpio I closed it because it's already linked in prisma/prisma#17199.
Feel free to re-open if you want.