[WIP] Add a parameter to ignore QPercent for remote voltage control. #1140
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?
For remote voltage control, in case several bus control the same target bus, the amount of reactive power to be provided by each controlling bus can be determined by qPercent. If this data is not provided as input, openLoadFlow falls back to a repartition key based on reactive power range.
In some situations, the qPercent data is irrelevant and it is desired to always use the bus reactive power range as repartition key.
The new parameter enables to ignore the qPercent input data and use this default repartition key.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
New parameter and associated behaviour.
What is the current behavior?
qPercent are used if present.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
Same as before, unless the parameter remoteVoltageControlIgnoreQPercent is explicitely set to True.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?