Work around bug in difflib #116
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #116 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 95.95% 95.95%
=======================================
Files 62 62
Lines 2568 2572 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 2464 2468 +4
Misses 104 104
|
andrecsilva
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
Works around an edge case in
difflibthat produces incorrect diffsDescription
difflibhas a bug that causes it to produce incorrect unified diffs in certain cases: difflib.unified_diff(...) produces invalid patches python/cpython#46395