Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Users and their political views #17

Open
busla opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Users and their political views #17

busla opened this issue Jan 7, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@busla
Copy link
Collaborator

busla commented Jan 7, 2016

What I´m a bit worried about is that SV is storing peoples votes (https://github.com/piratar/safetyvalve/blob/master/safetyvalve/petition/models.py#L74). In essence, SV is tracking peoples political views which is something to think about.

Tracking votes is obviously needed so users can get an overview of their signatures, revoke signatures, et.c, so some kind of tracking is needed.

What @helgihg and @tomage mentioned, regarding some kind of validation with an external db that admins have no control over is something that might need more discussion.

@thorgnyr
Copy link
Contributor

thorgnyr commented Jan 7, 2016

Am I crazy to think that this is actually interesting info to have? We
just need to make sure it's anonymous.

But perhaps I'm simply being a mad scientist here.

On 07/01/16 15:36, Jón Levy wrote:

What I´m a bit worried about is that SV is storing peoples votes
(https://github.com/piratar/safetyvalve/blob/master/safetyvalve/petition/models.py#L74).
In essence, SV is tracking peoples political views which is something to
think about.

Tracking votes is obviously needed so users can get an overview of their
signatures, revoke signatures, et.c, so some kind of tracking is needed.

What @helgihg https://github.com/helgihg and @tomage
https://github.com/tomage mentioned, regarding some kind of validation
with an external db that admins have no control over is something that
needs more discussion.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17.

@kjwise
Copy link

kjwise commented Jan 7, 2016

With enough votes you can possibly infer who the person is behind them even if we keep all tracking anonymous.

Vote record could be encrypted using the persons credentials possibly.

Then again, perhaps not such a huge issue, but could be used to attack Piratar for not standing by their values if not done properly.

cheers

On 07 Jan 2016, at 17:33, Þórgnýr Thoroddsen [email protected] wrote:

Am I crazy to think that this is actually interesting info to have? We
just need to make sure it's anonymous.

But perhaps I'm simply being a mad scientist here.

On 07/01/16 15:36, Jón Levy wrote:

What I´m a bit worried about is that SV is storing peoples votes
(https://github.com/piratar/safetyvalve/blob/master/safetyvalve/petition/models.py#L74).
In essence, SV is tracking peoples political views which is something to
think about.

Tracking votes is obviously needed so users can get an overview of their
signatures, revoke signatures, et.c, so some kind of tracking is needed.

What @helgihg https://github.com/helgihg and @tomage
https://github.com/tomage mentioned, regarding some kind of validation
with an external db that admins have no control over is something that
needs more discussion.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #17 (comment).

@jamesrobb
Copy link
Collaborator

How does a meet Friday or Saturday to discuss work?

//-- James Robb
//-- +354.666.0887 (Iceland/Ísland)
On Jan 7, 2016 5:33 PM, "Þórgnýr Thoroddsen" [email protected]
wrote:

Am I crazy to think that this is actually interesting info to have? We
just need to make sure it's anonymous.

But perhaps I'm simply being a mad scientist here.

On 07/01/16 15:36, Jón Levy wrote:

What I´m a bit worried about is that SV is storing peoples votes
(
https://github.com/piratar/safetyvalve/blob/master/safetyvalve/petition/models.py#L74
).
In essence, SV is tracking peoples political views which is something to
think about.

Tracking votes is obviously needed so users can get an overview of their
signatures, revoke signatures, et.c, so some kind of tracking is needed.

What @helgihg https://github.com/helgihg and @tomage
https://github.com/tomage mentioned, regarding some kind of validation
with an external db that admins have no control over is something that
needs more discussion.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment).

@busla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busla commented Jan 7, 2016

I´m available either day.

@thorgnyr
Copy link
Contributor

thorgnyr commented Jan 7, 2016

Right you are. (Also for so tactfully confirming my insanity).

On 07/01/16 17:37, Jóhann Haukur Gunnarsson wrote:

With enough votes you can possibly infer who the person is behind them
even if we keep all tracking anonymous.

Vote record could be encrypted using the persons credentials possibly.

Then again, perhaps not such a huge issue, but could be used to attack
Piratar for not standing by their values if not done properly.

cheers

On 07 Jan 2016, at 17:33, Þórgnýr Thoroddsen
[email protected] wrote:

Am I crazy to think that this is actually interesting info to have? We
just need to make sure it's anonymous.

But perhaps I'm simply being a mad scientist here.

On 07/01/16 15:36, Jón Levy wrote:

What I´m a bit worried about is that SV is storing peoples votes

(https://github.com/piratar/safetyvalve/blob/master/safetyvalve/petition/models.py#L74).
In essence, SV is tracking peoples political views which is something to
think about.

Tracking votes is obviously needed so users can get an overview of their
signatures, revoke signatures, et.c, so some kind of tracking is needed.

What @helgihg https://github.com/helgihg and @tomage
https://github.com/tomage mentioned, regarding some kind of validation
with an external db that admins have no control over is something that
needs more discussion.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment).

@busla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busla commented Jan 7, 2016

@kjwise could you explain this a bit?

EDIT:
The first paragraph I mean.

@busla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busla commented Jan 8, 2016

I will be coding at Stofan around 10:00 tonight if anyone wants to join.

@jamesrobb
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we will need to catch up tomorrow or in the week.

//-- James Robb
//-- +354.666.0887 (Iceland/Ísland)
On Jan 8, 2016 6:36 PM, "Jón Levy" [email protected] wrote:

I will be coding at Stofan around 10:00 tonight if anyone wants to join.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment).

@busla
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busla commented Jan 8, 2016

Great

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants