executor: make retriever memory tracker fine grained

[tangenta]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #58985

Problem Summary: See #58985 (comment)

What changed and how does it work?

Move memory tracker consumption calling into each info schema table. On the other hand, I batch the records to avoid calling the memory tracker too frequently, which may affect the performance.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

mysql> desc analyze select * from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.tables;
+----------------+----------+---------+------+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+---------------+---------+------+
| id             | estRows  | actRows | task | access object | execution info                                           | operator info | memory  | disk |
+----------------+----------+---------+------+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+---------------+---------+------+
| MemTableScan_4 | 10000.00 | 50823   | root | table:TABLES  | time:948.6ms, open:370ns, close:483ns, loops:51, RU:0.00 |               | 91.1 MB | N/A  |
+----------------+----------+---------+------+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+---------------+---------+------+
1 row in set (0.95 sec)

mysql> set tidb_mem_quota_query = 80 << 20;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

mysql> desc analyze select * from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.tables;
ERROR 8175 (HY000): Your query has been cancelled due to exceeding the allowed memory limit for a single SQL query. Please try narrowing your query scope or increase the tidb_mem_quota_query limit and try again.[conn=3923771498]

• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wshwsh12

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [wshwsh12]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2025-01-16 08:56:50.582884789 +0000 UTC m=+195282.037930960: ☑️ agreed by wshwsh12.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.32258% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 73.4749%. Comparing base (803f928) to head (656d4d5).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #58986        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.0083%   73.4749%   +0.4665%     
================================================
  Files          1682       1682                
  Lines        465589     465696       +107     
================================================
+ Hits         339919     342170      +2251     
+ Misses       104736     102630      -2106     
+ Partials      20934      20896        -38     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	42.8252% <60.2150%> (?)
unit	72.2360% <84.9462%> (+0.0317%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	45.3184% <ø> (+0.0374%)	⬆️

[tangenta]

/retest

[tiprow]

@tangenta: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.