Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix carbon price reporting for EU21 runs if sectorally differentiated carbon taxes via switch cm_CO2TaxSectorMarkup are used #554

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 1, 2024

Conversation

fschreyer
Copy link
Contributor

For running REMIND-EU with cm_CO2TaxSectorMarkup, the reporting needed some fixing.

Felix Schreyer added 2 commits February 28, 2024 17:42
… and the EU regionmapping with 21 regions is chosen. Relevant for using switch cm_CO2TaxSectorMarkup in REMIND-EU runs.
@fschreyer fschreyer requested a review from orichters March 1, 2024 12:03
Copy link
Contributor

@orichters orichters left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you say so :)

Don't really get what the problem was.

But thanks for fixing!

@fschreyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Don't really get what the problem was.

I could have been more explicit. Essentially, the problem was that output_wo_GLO comes with all aggregated regions like EU27 etc., while p21_CO2TaxSectorMarkup only comes with REMIND regions. So, I guess the lesson is that one needs to mind that when combining the output objects of reporting functions, which feature more regions, with parameters or variables that get read in from REMIND directly.

@fschreyer fschreyer merged commit 19bac21 into pik-piam:master Mar 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@orichters
Copy link
Contributor

@fschreyer: Another thought: Did you see this warning? I think using sectorally differentiated carbon taxes with EU21 is not advisable, as of now.

@fschreyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fschreyer: Another thought: Did you see this warning? I think using sectorally differentiated carbon taxes with EU21 is not advisable, as of now.

Thanks. I did not see it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants