Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add cloud integration features to qadence #592

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pimvenderbosch
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR aims to add features to qadence that enable the user to upload their workloads to Pasqal's cloud platform.

@pimvenderbosch pimvenderbosch self-assigned this Oct 29, 2024
@pimvenderbosch pimvenderbosch added the feature New feature or request label Oct 29, 2024
@pimvenderbosch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pimvenderbosch commented Oct 29, 2024

Hi @RolandMacDoland,

I've pushed a prototype of how the cloud integration could look like in qadence. The actual implementation is not there yet. Could you quickly review to see that this goes into the desired direction?
The functions that will be exposed to the user are: upload_workload, check_status and get_result

Copy link
Collaborator

@RolandMacDoland RolandMacDoland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @pimvenderbosch. LGTM. Minor comments but I think they might be irrelevant after I went through the code. Happy to approve after threads resolution. Another point, I think there is a way to test the cloud connection internally. But we need to discuss this.

qadence/pasqal_cloud_connection.py Show resolved Hide resolved
qadence/pasqal_cloud_connection.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
qadence/pasqal_cloud_connection.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants