Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

audit.toml: Add Marvin Attack from rsa crate to ignore list #134

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 1, 2023

Conversation

gowthamsk-arm
Copy link
Contributor

The rsa crate is only used for testing purpose and the security vulnerability has no impact on this crate.

Signed-off-by: Gowtham Suresh Kumar [email protected]

The rsa crate is only used for testing purpose and the security
vulnerability has no impact on this crate.

Signed-off-by: Gowtham Suresh Kumar <[email protected]>
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
[advisories]
ignore = [
"RUSTSEC-2023-0071", # `rsa` Marvin Attack not concerning as `rsa` is only used for tests

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What happens if we suddenly use it elsewhere (not in tests) ? Can we ignore it only for certain files?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As this is an FFI layer for PSA, I can't think of a situation where we would provide an RSA operation from "rsa" crate here. Any particular situation you can think of?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really, but I do think this may be useful for other situations.
If you prefer not to add it in this one, we can keep in mind for future parallaxsecond PRs, as I'm sure a case in which this would apply will happen later.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it might happen in other repos. I'm unaware if there is an option to restrict audit ignores to specific files. Let me have a look.

@gowthamsk-arm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copy link
Member

@tgonzalezorlandoarm tgonzalezorlandoarm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tgonzalezorlandoarm tgonzalezorlandoarm merged commit f2d2351 into parallaxsecond:main Dec 1, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants