-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow handlers to return user-defined error types #1180
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Enforce that `HttpResponseError`s status codes are 4xx or 5xx using an `ErrorStatusCode` type which may only be those statuses. See: #39 (comment) While we're making breaking API changes, let's also have `HttpError::for_status` take a validated client-error-only type, rather than panicking surprisingly. This way, it's obvious to the user that the argument to this has to be a 4xx. Fixes #693
it occurs to me that |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for doing this
@@ -919,27 +925,59 @@ impl<Context: ServerContext> ApiDescription<Context> { | |||
} | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
// If the endpoint defines an error type, emit that for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively, we could have added to components.responses
as before and then referenced that. I can see the inline approach you've taken as potentially simpler, though it does bloat up the json output...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, I'd like to put them in components.responses
, too. The reason I didn't is that it might be a bit annoying to determine the name for each response schema. schemars
internally disambiguates colliding schema names by turning subsequent ones into like Error2
or whatever, but (AFAICT) we only get that when we actually generate the schema and it gives us back a reference (into components.schemas
). We could then try to parse that reference and get the name back out to then use it to generate a components.responses
entry for that response, which seems possible, I just thought it seemed annoying enough that I didn't really want to bother with it. Do you think it's worth doing?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if we name the response based on <T as JsonSchema>::schema_name()
? Might that work?
Do I think it's worth doing? I think it's worth trying. It might make the code worse, but it might make the output simpler. At a minimum it will make the diffs against current json simpler. These together--I think--at least warrant giving it a shot.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't believe that deduplication is applied to JsonSchema::schema_name()
; as
far as I can tell, it only happens once a schema has already been generated,
because that's when the generator can check if the name already exists in the
set of schemas that have been generated so far?
@@ -943,9 +946,9 @@ async fn http_request_handle<C: ServerContext>( | |||
), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we be firing a USDT probe here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We weren't previously, but yeah, we probably should. I can add it in this PR if that makes sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably doesn't... (unless you've done it already). We can file an issue
Co-authored-by: Adam Leventhal <[email protected]>
= note: `HttpResponse` is implemented for `Result<T, E>` where `T: HttpResponse` and `E: HttpResponseError` | ||
= note: `HttpResponse` is implemented for `http::Response<dropshot::Body>` | ||
= help: the trait `HttpResponse` is implemented for `Result<T, E>` | ||
note: required by a bound in `validate_response_type` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this still feels a little more opaque than bad_endpoint10 -- would this be impacted if we put a #[diagnostic] on HttpResponse? In particular, I'd love to have it be clearer that the problem is String
here...
dropshot/src/handler.rs
Outdated
/// 3. The response returned by the handler function fails to be converted into | ||
/// a `Response<Body>`. | ||
/// | ||
/// In cases (1) and (3), the error will always be an [`HttpError`], but in case |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oof! As discussed in DMs, this is kind of awful. In particular it means that sometimes clients will see the custom error type and sometimes not! It's also a mess with regard to OpenAPI. We could just say "the error is oneOf
these types", and that's awful too!
As discussed, we might add conversion methods to HttpResponseError
for cases 1 and 3 here.
See #1180 (comment) This does mean we can no longer have infallible endpoint handlers, but I never actually wanted that in the first place --- it's just a side benefit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this direction
--> tests/fail/bad_endpoint10.rs:16:6 | ||
| | ||
16 | ) -> Result<HttpResponseOk<()>, String> { | ||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `HttpResponse` is not implemented for `Result<HttpResponseOk<()>, String>` | ||
| ^^^^^^ the trait `HttpResponseError` is not implemented for `String` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we want a #[diagnostic] that helps users find HttpError?
Currently, all endpoint handler functions must return a
Result<T, HttpError>
, whereT
implementsHttpResponse
. This isunfortunate, as it limits how error return values are represented in
the API. There isn't presently a mechanism for an endpoint to return
a structured error value of its own which is part of the OpenAPI spec
for that endpoint. This is discussed at length in issue #39.
This branch relaxes this requirement, and instead allows endpoint
handler functions to return any type that implements
HttpResponse
.This includes
Result<T, HttpError> where T: HttpResponse
, but it alsoincludes any
Result<T, E>
whereT
implementsHttpResponse
andE
implements a new
HttpResponseError
trait, which defines how to converta value into an error response.
Incidentally, changing the return type of handler functions from
Result<T: HttpResponse, HttpError>
to just anyT: HttpResponse
alsopermits endpoint handler functions to be infallible and just always
return a response. This was not a primary goal of this change, but it
seems kind of nice to have anyway.
The
HttpResponseError
trait defines how to produce an error responsefor an error value. This is implemented by
dropshot
'sHttpError
type, but it may also be implemented by user errors. Types implementing
this trait must implement
HttpResponseContent
, to determine how togenerate the response body and define its schema, and they must also
implement a method
HttpResponseError::status_code
to provide thestatus code to use for the error response. This is somewhat different
from the existing
HttpCodedResponse
trait, which allows successfulresponses to indicate at compile time that they will always have a
particular status code, such as 201 Created. Errors are a bit different:
we would like to be able to return any number of different error status
codes, but would still like to ensure that they represent errors, in
order to correctly generate an OpenAPI document where the error schemas
are returned only for error responses (see this comment for
details). As discussed here, we ensure this by providing new
ErrorStatusCode
andClientErrorStatusCode
types, which are newtypesaround
http::StatusCode
that only contain a 4xx or 5xx status (in thecase of
ErrorStatusCode
), or only contain a 4xx (in the case ofClientErrorStatusCode
). These types may be fallibly converted from anhttp::StatusCode
at runtime, but we also provide constants forwell-known 4xx and 5xx statuses, which can be used infallibly. The
HttpResponseError::status_code
method returns anErrorStatusCode
rather than a
http::StatusCode
, allowing us to ensure that error typesalways have error statuses and generate a correct OpenAPI document.
Additionally, while adding
ErrorStatusCode
s, I've gone ahead andchanged the
dropshot::HttpError
type to also use it, and changed theHttpError::for_client_error
andHttpError::for_status
constructorsto take a
ClientErrorStatusCode
. Although this is a breaking change,it resolves a long-standing issue with these APIs: currently, they
assert that the provided status code is a 4xx internally, which is often
surprising to the user. Thus, this PR fixes #693.
Fixes #700
Fixes #39
Fixes #693
Fixes #801
This branch is a second attempt at the change originally proposed in PR
#1164, so this closes #1164. This design is substantially simpler, and
only addresses the ability for handler functions to return
user-defined types. Other changes made in #1164, such as a way to
specify a global handler for dropshot-generated errors, and adding
headers to
HttpError
responses, can be addressed separately. For now,all extractors and internal errors still produce
dropshot::HttpError
s.A subsequent change will implement a mechanism for providing alternate
presentation for such errors (such as an HTML 404 page).