Add streamlined data policy #27
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
The current proposed ORCESTRA data policy is now open to public discussion since about 1.5 months and there are still no objections to this policy. I'd suggest to merge the current proposal if no further objections arise in the next days. If needed, further changes to the proposed policy could be proposed in new pull requests afterwards. |
yu71ng
reviewed
Jul 8, 2024
yu71ng
reviewed
Jul 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: YWu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: YWu <[email protected]>
yu71ng
reviewed
Jul 8, 2024
orcestra_book/data_policy.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| For publications using ORCESTRA data, please include this acknowledgement: | ||
|
|
||
| > "The data used in this publication was collected during the ORCESTRA field campaign and is available through [insert institute name]. ORCESTRA is supported by the European Space Agency (ESA), the Max Planck Society (MPG), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the German Aerospace Center (DLR), the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), and the US National Science Foundation (NSF)." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| > "The data used in this publication was collected during the ORCESTRA field campaign and is available through [insert institute name]. ORCESTRA is supported by the European Space Agency (ESA), the Max Planck Society (MPG), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the German Aerospace Center (DLR), the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), and the US National Science Foundation (NSF)." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With the suggested changes, I would have no idea what to put into the acknowledgements 🤷♂️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about the following to keep it more generic like the rest of the policy:
Suggested change
| > "The data used in this publication was collected during the ORCESTRA field campaign and is available through [insert institute name]. ORCESTRA is supported by the European Space Agency (ESA), the Max Planck Society (MPG), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the German Aerospace Center (DLR), the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), and the US National Science Foundation (NSF)." | |
| > "The data used in this publication was collected during the ORCESTRA field campaign and is available through [insert institute name]. ORCESTRA acknowledges support from European, North American, Barbadian and Cape Verdian institutions and funding agencies." |
I tried fine tuning the wording, I am not sure it is better, but have a look. In the end I changed my mind and thought that a listing of the overarching institutions supporting/funding the project would probably save us lots of hassle later on, but I ordered these a bit by my sense of their initiating role. Please feel free to nit pick
|
Hello, |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR builds heavily on the work in #26, but aims for a more streamlined version of the data policy. While the content of the policy remains the same, the general structure is less rule-based and attempts to merely motivate the ideas.