Use separate cosmosdb containers for production vs staging vs development #202
Conversation
Fixes #197 Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request modify the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
dthaler
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
OrcanodeMonitor/Data/OrcanodeMonitorContext.cs (3)
30-36: Reduce duplication in container configurationThe container name is repeated in multiple places, which could lead to maintenance issues.
Consider extracting container names into constants:
+ private const string MONITOR_STATE_CONTAINER = "MonitorState"; + protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) { // ... environment setup ... modelBuilder.Entity<MonitorState>() - .ToContainer(environment + "MonitorState") + .ToContainer(environment + MONITOR_STATE_CONTAINER) .Property(item => item.ID) .HasConversion<string>(); modelBuilder.Entity<MonitorState>() - .ToContainer(environment + "MonitorState") + .ToContainer(environment + MONITOR_STATE_CONTAINER) .HasPartitionKey(item=>item.ID);
39-54: Consolidate repeated container configurationsThe Orcanode container name is repeated in four places, increasing the risk of inconsistencies.
Consider this refactoring:
+ private const string ORCANODE_CONTAINER = "Orcanode"; + protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) { // ... environment setup ... + + var orcanodeEntity = modelBuilder.Entity<Orcanode>(); + string orcanodeContainer = environment + ORCANODE_CONTAINER; + + orcanodeEntity + .ToContainer(orcanodeContainer) + .Property(item => item.PartitionValue) + .HasConversion<string>(); + + orcanodeEntity + .Property(item => item.ID); + + orcanodeEntity + .Property(item => item.AudioStreamStatus) + .HasDefaultValue(OrcanodeOnlineStatus.Absent); + + orcanodeEntity + .HasPartitionKey(item => item.PartitionValue) + .HasKey(item=>item.ID);
23-66: Consider operational implications of container separationWhile the implementation effectively separates containers between environments, consider these operational aspects:
- Data migration strategy for existing environments
- Backup and restore procedures across different container names
- Cost implications of maintaining separate containers
- Monitoring and alerting configuration for new container names
Consider documenting these aspects in your deployment guide and updating any operational procedures that reference container names directly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
OrcanodeMonitor/Data/OrcanodeMonitorContext.cs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
OrcanodeMonitor/Data/OrcanodeMonitorContext.cs (1)
58-66: Verify cross-container relationships with environment prefixes
The OrcanodeEvent entity has a foreign key relationship with Orcanode. Since containers now have environment-specific names, ensure that the relationship works correctly across prefixed containers.
Run the following script to find all foreign key relationships that might be affected:
✅ Verification successful
Cross-container relationships are properly configured
The relationship between OrcanodeEvent and Orcanode is correctly set up with proper foreign key configuration. Both entities use environment-prefixed containers (environment + "OrcanodeEvent" and environment + "Orcanode"), and the relationship is established using standard EF Core configuration:
- Foreign key is explicitly defined using
HasForeignKey(item=>item.OrcanodeId) - Cascade delete behavior is configured
- The relationship is consistently defined across migrations
This is a valid configuration for Cosmos DB, which supports cross-container references as long as the foreign keys are properly maintained, which is the case here.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for foreign key configurations that might be affected by container prefixing
ast-grep --pattern 'HasForeignKey($_)'
# Search for relationship configurations
ast-grep --pattern 'HasOne($_)'
ast-grep --pattern 'WithMany($_)'
Length of output: 3032
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep to find relationship configurations
# Search for HasOne and WithMany configurations
rg -A 2 -B 2 "HasOne|WithMany" --type cs
# Also search for any container configurations
rg -A 2 -B 2 "ToContainer" --type cs
Length of output: 6163
| string environment = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT") ?? string.Empty; | ||
| if (environment == "Production") | ||
| { | ||
| environment = string.Empty; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing environment handling robustness
The current implementation has several potential improvements to consider:
- Validate against a specific set of allowed environments
- Use case-insensitive comparison
- Add logging to track which environment is being used
Consider this enhanced implementation:
- string environment = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT") ?? string.Empty;
- if (environment == "Production")
- {
- environment = string.Empty;
- }
+ var allowedEnvironments = new[] { "Development", "Staging", "Production" };
+ string envName = Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("ASPNETCORE_ENVIRONMENT") ?? "Production";
+
+ if (!allowedEnvironments.Contains(envName, StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
+ {
+ throw new InvalidOperationException($"Invalid environment: {envName}. Allowed values are: {string.Join(", ", allowedEnvironments)}");
+ }
+
+ string environment = envName.Equals("Production", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
+ ? string.Empty
+ : envName + "_";
+
+ _logger?.LogInformation("Initializing Cosmos DB containers with environment prefix: '{Prefix}'", environment);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Read the environment variable and use it as a prefix for the container name.
Treat "Production" as the empty prefix, so as to use the existing containers.
Fixes #197
Summary by CodeRabbit