-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Keep same tab for pages on same site #184
Conversation
Also add some more logging for unusual events Fixes #182 Signed-off-by: Dave Thaler <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)OrcanodeMonitor/Pages/Index.cshtml (3)
The implementation correctly uses ASP.NET Core routing for same-site navigation without opening a new tab, which aligns with the PR objectives.
The implementation correctly uses ASP.NET Core routing for same-site navigation and includes a descriptive aria-label for accessibility. Line range hint The changes maintain a consistent navigation pattern where:
This implementation aligns with the PR objectives and follows common web practices for navigation. OrcanodeMonitor/Core/Fetcher.cs (1)Line range hint While the added logging for duplicate nodes is helpful, consider the following improvements:
Consider this enhanced implementation: -logger.LogWarning($"Merging duplicate nodes for {node.DataplicitySerial}");
+logger.LogWarning(
+ "Merging duplicate nodes: Target={TargetId} Source={SourceId} Serial={Serial}",
+ node.ID,
+ dataplicityNode.ID,
+ node.DataplicitySerial);
+
+// Verify no data loss during merge
+if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(dataplicityNode.OrcasoundFeedId) ||
+ !string.IsNullOrEmpty(dataplicityNode.OrcasoundName))
+{
+ logger.LogWarning(
+ "Duplicate node has unexpected Orcasound data: Node={NodeId}",
+ dataplicityNode.ID);
+} Let's verify if there are any other instances of node merging in the codebase: ✅ Verification successfulLet's gather more specific information about node merging operations in the relevant files, excluding the bootstrap and jQuery files which are just library files. Let's examine the Orcanode model to understand all its properties and verify if there could be any data loss during the merge operation. Based on the examination of the Orcanode model and the merge operation context, I can now provide the final response: Merge operation is safe, but logging can be improved The merge operation in
However, the logging suggestion in the review comment is valid and would improve debugging capabilities. -logger.LogWarning($"Merging duplicate nodes for {node.DataplicitySerial}");
+logger.LogWarning(
+ "Merging duplicate nodes: Target={TargetId} Source={SourceId} Serial={Serial} TargetName={TargetName} SourceName={SourceName}",
+ node.ID,
+ dataplicityNode.ID,
+ node.DataplicitySerial,
+ node.OrcasoundName,
+ dataplicityNode.DataplicityName); 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for other node merging operations
rg -l "Merging.*nodes|Remove.*node|context.*Remove"
Length of output: 491 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for context around node merging and removal operations in the core files
rg -A 5 -B 5 "Merging.*nodes|Remove.*node|context.*Remove" OrcanodeMonitor/Core/MezmoFetcher.cs OrcanodeMonitor/Core/Fetcher.cs OrcanodeMonitor/Api/OrcanodesController.cs
Length of output: 7082 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for the Orcanode model definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class Orcanode {
$$$
}'
# In case it's defined with different syntax or in a different way, let's also try ripgrep
rg -A 30 "class Orcanode"
Length of output: 18497 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Also add some more logging for unusual events
Fixes #182
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
MezmoFetcher
.Style
target="_blank"
attribute from specific anchor tags in the web application, changing how links open.Documentation