You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a set, suppose a user never attempted some problem, but has 100% for it. Maybe because that score was manually awarded. Maybe from some achievement item (although perhaps achievement items that change a score also set the problem's "attempted" flag?)
Then you get something like this in Grades:
This is a set where I manually awarded myself 100% on all exercises. Not using the problem grader, just using the old school Set Details page for my user and entering 1 for all the status values. Later I actually did Submit the first two exercises.
So you can see I have 15/15, but the display for my unattempted problems is confusing.
Is this how this should be?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Seems the grade table wasn't designed with achievements or grade overrides in mind. Probably best to just show the 100% status even when a problem hasn't been attempted. Here is the line in the grade_set method that is doing it.
I already have a PR to correctly show green highlighting with reduced scoring enabled to help improve this page, I could add this to that (though I do know you are also working on the grade_set method with your PR).
In a set, suppose a user never attempted some problem, but has 100% for it. Maybe because that score was manually awarded. Maybe from some achievement item (although perhaps achievement items that change a score also set the problem's "attempted" flag?)
Then you get something like this in Grades:
This is a set where I manually awarded myself 100% on all exercises. Not using the problem grader, just using the old school Set Details page for my user and entering 1 for all the status values. Later I actually did Submit the first two exercises.
So you can see I have 15/15, but the display for my unattempted problems is confusing.
Is this how this should be?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: