Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport/backport 15194 to 2.16 #15286

Conversation

finnegancarroll
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Backport #15194

Related Issues

Resolves #15169

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Finn Carroll <[email protected]>
@msfroh
Copy link
Collaborator

msfroh commented Aug 16, 2024

Do we definitely want to backport this to 2.16 for a 2.16.1 patch release?

Or are we good backporting to 2.x for a fix in 2.17?

From #15169, it sounds like the index setting to disable the optimization provides a workaround for folks broken by the bug in 2.16.

Signed-off-by: Finn Carroll <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for a762cb1: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for f6f9c4e: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@finnegancarroll
Copy link
Contributor Author

This change should only backport to 2.x.
Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants