[Remote Store] Add check for byte lag in time lag calculation

[ashking94]

Description

In this PR, we are adding a defensive check which is used for determining the time lag. The time lag can show erroneous value if there is a refresh without any additional data ingested as segments.

Related Issues

No issue created.

Check List

• [ ] New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• [ ] New functionality has been documented.
  • [ ] New functionality has javadoc added
• Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
• [ ] Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
• [ ] Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change b381ca0

Incompatible components

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/flow-framework.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-oci-object-storage.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git]

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for 8db4b29: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for 2fdfb33: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

❕ Gradle check result for b381ca0: UNSTABLE

• TEST FAILURES:

      1 org.opensearch.search.SearchWeightedRoutingIT.testMultiGetWithNetworkDisruption_FailOpenEnabled

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.48%. Comparing base (63f20fe) to head (b381ca0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #12565      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     71.43%   71.48%   +0.04%     
- Complexity    59958    60036      +78     
============================================
  Files          4984     4984              
  Lines        282247   282247              
  Branches      40952    40952              
============================================
+ Hits         201615   201752     +137     
+ Misses        63903    63762     -141     
- Partials      16729    16733       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.