Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: interactive rubric #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023
Merged

feat: interactive rubric #33

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2023

Conversation

leangseu-edx
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

src/utils/smartCamelize.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/testUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@muselesscreator
Copy link
Contributor

If introducing api actions separated from the fetch functionality, plz rename api.ts to data.ts or fetch.ts for clarity?

src/setupTest.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@muselesscreator
Copy link
Contributor

V much appreciate the updates! Plz take a look at remaining comments and merge conflicts and we will see if we can get merged tomorrow.

As a note: having component hooks in ts is still a step beyond current community plans, but is a small/similar enough chunk of code that is still contract based, so I think still brings enough value to include as experiment

@leangseu-edx leangseu-edx force-pushed the lk/rubric-interactive branch 3 times, most recently from 4c40485 to ee48348 Compare September 19, 2023 14:29
Copy link
Contributor

@muselesscreator muselesscreator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Plz fix tests tho

chore: remove smart camelize

chore: update logic and rewrite in typescript

chore: revert back to jsx

chore: rename api.ts to data.ts

chore: update test
@leangseu-edx leangseu-edx merged commit 50d2870 into master Sep 19, 2023
3 checks passed
@leangseu-edx leangseu-edx deleted the lk/rubric-interactive branch September 19, 2023 18:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants