-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: update for OEP-58 implementation - FC-55 and FC-12 #540
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @OmarIthawi! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
b185f5c
to
3947c42
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I haven't tested these instructions, but they're clear and easy to read
@brian-smith-tcril would you take a quick read through and merge if you're satisfied? |
@brian-smith-tcril @sarina would you mind triaging this PR? |
.. _transifex.yml: https://github.com/openedx/openedx-translations/blob/main/transifex.yml | ||
.. _Drag and Drop XBlock transifex.yml entry: https://github.com/openedx/openedx-translations/blob/19c0fcbbc334c56022df355fa5b529e5853d30f9/transifex.yml#L253-L259 | ||
.. _edx-platform e7fc0c6: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/commit/e7fc0c6b6f8b44fa4bcc71d00ae2931f91cc664c | ||
.. _edx-platform Redwood: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/commit/e7fc0c6b6f8b44fa4bcc71d00ae2931f91cc664c |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be a tag?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the naming is just confusing here. The link is to the commit feat: 'atlas pull' for XBlock translations | FC-0012
. Linking to the tagged version wouldn't provide the same context as linking to this commit.
I think another possible option would be to link to the PR (openedx/edx-platform#33698), so up on line 48 where it says "Redwood or newer" we could change that to be "A version of edx-platform that includes PR 33698 (Redwood or newer)."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed, now Redwood is behind us. Removing the link altogether makes more sense.
fae14cb
to
97945eb
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @brian-smith-tcril @sarina for the review and sorry for the delay. Now it's ready with all notes addressed.
.. _transifex.yml: https://github.com/openedx/openedx-translations/blob/main/transifex.yml | ||
.. _Drag and Drop XBlock transifex.yml entry: https://github.com/openedx/openedx-translations/blob/19c0fcbbc334c56022df355fa5b529e5853d30f9/transifex.yml#L253-L259 | ||
.. _edx-platform e7fc0c6: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/commit/e7fc0c6b6f8b44fa4bcc71d00ae2931f91cc664c | ||
.. _edx-platform Redwood: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/commit/e7fc0c6b6f8b44fa4bcc71d00ae2931f91cc664c |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed, now Redwood is behind us. Removing the link altogether makes more sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll merge once the devstack ref is removed
@@ -274,5 +273,4 @@ After adding a repository to the `openedx-translations repo`_ verify the followi | |||
|
|||
.. _Tutor: https://docs.tutor.overhang.io/ | |||
.. _devstack: https://github.com/openedx/devstack/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Is this reference now unused?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch, now done!
97945eb
to
a1198f3
Compare
Docs update after OEP-58 has been implemented.
See: