[WIP] Show the GPU requests and limits in workbench table

[dpanshug]

RHOAIENG-16749

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Create a workbench and connect it to accelerators.

Test Impact

Added unit tests

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

@xianli123

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign manosnoam for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[dpanshug]

WIP: need to add same for the hardware profiles

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.25%. Comparing base (7ffc255) to head (f8d97c8).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...s/screens/detail/notebooks/NotebookSizeDetails.tsx	57.14%	6 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3654      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.26%   84.25%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1432     1434       +2     
  Lines       33489    33514      +25     
  Branches     9284     9297      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        28218    28237      +19     
- Misses       5271     5277       +6     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...r/screens/server/AcceleratorProfileSelectField.tsx	66.66% <100.00%> (-0.38%)	⬇️
...ller/screens/server/useAcceleratorCountWarning.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ects/screens/detail/notebooks/NotebookTableRow.tsx	88.05% <100.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
...c/pages/projects/screens/detail/notebooks/utils.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/screens/detail/notebooks/NotebookSizeDetails.tsx	68.42% <57.14%> (-31.58%)	⬇️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ffc255...f8d97c8. Read the comment docs.

[xianli123]

Thanks @dpanshug for doing this. Overall, it looks great.
A small optimization for the tooltip in the first screenshot: Could you please put the identifier name in parentheses? It will be No accelerator detected with the identifier “identifier name”. This will make it easier for users to realize the identifier name. (I'm sorry I didn't explain it in detail in the design.) What do you think?