Fix inconsistency in authentication

[lucferbux]

Closes https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-382

Description

Fix inconsistency in authentication working for model serving.

How Has This Been Tested?

1. Deploy a model through KServe
2. Select external route
3. Text should match "Token authentication"

Test Impact

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Commits have been squashed into descriptive, self-contained units of work (e.g. 'WIP' and 'Implements feedback' style messages have been removed)
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change (find relevant UX in the SMEs section).

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[lucferbux]

/hold

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 16.66667% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 78.78%. Comparing base (a7032c6) to head (5e1b3d8).
Report is 82 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2824      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.46%   78.78%   +1.31%     
==========================================
  Files        1110     1105       -5     
  Lines       23521    23493      -28     
  Branches     5937     5925      -12     
==========================================
+ Hits        18220    18508     +288     
+ Misses       5301     4985     -316     

Files	Coverage Δ
...src/pages/home/aiFlows/DeployAndMonitorGallery.tsx	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...s/KServeSection/KServeInferenceServiceTableRow.tsx	88.46% <ø> (ø)
...lServing/screens/projects/ModelServingPlatform.tsx	96.38% <100.00%> (ø)
...screens/projects/kServeModal/ManageKServeModal.tsx	92.23% <ø> (ø)
...ServingRuntimeModal/ServingRuntimeTokenSection.tsx	78.94% <0.00%> (ø)
.../ServingRuntimeModal/AuthServingRuntimeSection.tsx	82.75% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 104 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a7032c6...5e1b3d8. Read the comment docs.

[lucferbux]

@kaedward @vconzola can you guys take a look at this?

[vconzola]

@lucferbux I'm not sure what we're supposed to be looking at. The change was just to replace "authorization" with "authentication" throughout, correct? It looks like your PR does that. Is there anything else we need to review? cc: @kaedward

[lucferbux]

/unhold

[lucferbux]

@lucferbux I'm not sure what we're supposed to be looking at. The change was just to replace "authorization" with "authentication" throughout, correct? It looks like your PR does that. Is there anything else we need to review? cc: @kaedward

Oh yes, that was it, just to confirm those were the changes

[lucferbux]

/approve

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gitdallas, lucferbux

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [lucferbux]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[lucferbux]

/retest

[lucferbux]

/test odh-dashboard-pr-image-mirror