Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alex Boten <[email protected]>

README.md

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ In instances where there is a type mismatch between the JSON schema and equivale
 
 ### Name-value pairs
 
-When a type requires a configurable list of name-value pairs (i.e. resource attributes, HTTP headers), model using an array of objects, each with `name` and `value` properties. While an arrays of name-value objects is slightly more verbose an object where each key-value is an entry, it is preferred because:
+When a type requires a configurable list of name-value pairs (i.e. resource attributes, HTTP headers), model using an array of objects, each with `name` and `value` properties. While an array of name-value objects is slightly more verbose than an object where each key-value is an entry, the latter is preferred because:
 
 * Avoids user input as keys, which ensures conformity with the [snake_case properties](#property-name-case) rule.
 * Allows both the names and the values to be targets for [env var substitution]. For example:

examples/kitchen-sink.yaml

@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ resource:
     # Configure `service.name` resource attribute
     #
     # Environment variable: OTEL_SERVICE_NAME
-    - name: service-name
+    - name: service.name
       value: unknown_service
     # Configure other resource attributes with explicit types.
     - name: string_key