-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reduce contract size to ensure the contract is deployable #44
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update involves streamlining the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
5f6d163
to
20b7284
Compare
20b7284
to
0a8dbb8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- contracts/core/Dispatcher.sol (1 hunks)
- test/Dispatcher.t.sol (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- test/Dispatcher.t.sol
// FIXME this is commented out to make the contract size smaller. We need to optimise for size | ||
// function onCloseIbcChannel(address portAddress, bytes32 channelId, Ics23Proof calldata proof) external { | ||
// // verify VIBC/IBC hub chain has processed ChanCloseConfirm event | ||
// consensusStateManager.verifyMembership( | ||
// proof, | ||
// bytes('channel/path/to/be/added/here'), | ||
// bytes('expected channel bytes constructed from params. Channel.State = {Closed(_Pending?)}') | ||
// ); | ||
// | ||
// // ensure port owns channel | ||
// Channel memory channel = portChannelMap[portAddress][channelId]; | ||
// if (channel.counterpartyChannelId == bytes32(0)) { | ||
// revert channelNotOwnedByPortAddress(); | ||
// } | ||
// | ||
// // confirm with dApp by calling its callback | ||
// IbcChannelReceiver reciever = IbcChannelReceiver(portAddress); | ||
// reciever.onCloseIbcChannel(channelId, channel.counterpartyPortId, channel.counterpartyChannelId); | ||
// delete portChannelMap[portAddress][channelId]; | ||
// emit CloseIbcChannel(portAddress, channelId); | ||
// } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The onCloseIbcChannel
function has been commented out to reduce the contract size, which is a critical step towards ensuring the contract's deployability. However, this change impacts the contract's ability to handle channel closure events. It's important to consider the implications of this removal on the overall system functionality and whether alternative optimizations could achieve size reduction without sacrificing important features.
Consider optimizing contract size through other methods such as code refactoring, using libraries, or splitting the contract into smaller contracts to preserve important functionalities like channel closure handling.
* The dApp's onCloseIbcChannel callback is invoked. | ||
* dApp should throw an error if the channel should not be closed. | ||
*/ | ||
function onCloseIbcChannel(address portAddress, bytes32 channelId, Ics23Proof calldata proof) external { | ||
// verify VIBC/IBC hub chain has processed ChanCloseConfirm event | ||
consensusStateManager.verifyMembership( | ||
proof, | ||
bytes('channel/path/to/be/added/here'), | ||
bytes('expected channel bytes constructed from params. Channel.State = {Closed(_Pending?)}') | ||
); | ||
|
||
// ensure port owns channel | ||
Channel memory channel = portChannelMap[portAddress][channelId]; | ||
if (channel.counterpartyChannelId == bytes32(0)) { | ||
revert channelNotOwnedByPortAddress(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
// confirm with dApp by calling its callback | ||
IbcChannelReceiver reciever = IbcChannelReceiver(portAddress); | ||
reciever.onCloseIbcChannel(channelId, channel.counterpartyPortId, channel.counterpartyChannelId); | ||
delete portChannelMap[portAddress][channelId]; | ||
emit CloseIbcChannel(portAddress, channelId); | ||
} | ||
// FIXME this is commented out to make the contract size smaller. We need to optimise for size | ||
// function onCloseIbcChannel(address portAddress, bytes32 channelId, Ics23Proof calldata proof) external { | ||
// // verify VIBC/IBC hub chain has processed ChanCloseConfirm event | ||
// consensusStateManager.verifyMembership( | ||
// proof, | ||
// bytes('channel/path/to/be/added/here'), | ||
// bytes('expected channel bytes constructed from params. Channel.State = {Closed(_Pending?)}') | ||
// ); | ||
// | ||
// // ensure port owns channel | ||
// Channel memory channel = portChannelMap[portAddress][channelId]; | ||
// if (channel.counterpartyChannelId == bytes32(0)) { | ||
// revert channelNotOwnedByPortAddress(); | ||
// } | ||
// | ||
// // confirm with dApp by calling its callback | ||
// IbcChannelReceiver reciever = IbcChannelReceiver(portAddress); | ||
// reciever.onCloseIbcChannel(channelId, channel.counterpartyPortId, channel.counterpartyChannelId); | ||
// delete portChannelMap[portAddress][channelId]; | ||
// emit CloseIbcChannel(portAddress, channelId); | ||
// } | ||
|
||
// | ||
// IBC Packet methods |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]
The contract uses SPDX license identifier UNLICENSED
, which is appropriate for private or unpublished code but might not be suitable if the code is intended to be open-sourced. Ensure that the licensing aligns with the project's distribution and usage intentions.
Consider specifying a more specific license if the code is intended for open-source distribution, to clearly communicate usage rights and restrictions.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [3-3]
The contract specifies Solidity version ^0.8.9
. It's good practice to use a fixed Solidity version or a more constrained version range to avoid unexpected behavior due to compiler updates.
Consider using a fixed version or a narrower version range for Solidity to ensure consistent contract behavior.
- pragma solidity ^0.8.9;
+ pragma solidity 0.8.9;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm self-approving so we can unblock
Optimization to reduce contract size to ensure the contract is deployable.
Summary by CodeRabbit