-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Raunak/fork unit testing #116
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@RnkSngh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent updates improve the package's deployment capabilities, refine configuration settings, add new deployer accounts, and rectify bugs related to nonces. Additionally, the changes enhance the documentation and streamline the build process. These enhancements collectively ensure more robust and versatile contract deployments. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
src/evm/contracts/index.ts (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe search results show multiple occurrences of
ProofVerifier
in various files across the codebase. This indicates thatProofVerifier
is still being used and has not been fully removed.
src/evm/contracts/factories/ProofVerifier__factory.ts
src/evm/contracts/ProofVerifier.ts
These files and the related references should be reviewed and updated to ensure consistency.
Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-41
: All contract types and factories are correctly exported. Verify that the removal ofProofVerifier
is consistent across the entire codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `ProofVerifier` is not used elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `ProofVerifier`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type typescript 'ProofVerifier'Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `ProofVerifier` is not used elsewhere in the codebase. # Test: Search for usage of `ProofVerifier`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type ts 'ProofVerifier'Length of output: 7908
specs/contracts.spec.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-88
: The deployment specifications are well-defined. Consider removing trailing spaces to adhere to YAML best practices.- # spec for deploying contracts + # spec for deploying contractssrc/tx.ts (2)
50-51
: Review the merging ofenv
andexistingContractAddresses
. Ensure that the spread operation does not unintentionally overwrite important values.Consider verifying the order of properties in the object merge to ensure that
existingContractAddresses
does not unintentionally overwrite entries inenv
.
Line range hint
60-60
: Use optional chaining to improve robustness.- const factoryName = tx.factoryName ? tx.factoryName : tx.name; + const factoryName = tx.factoryName ?? tx.name;src/deploy.ts (2)
Line range hint
28-28
: Consider reordering default parameters in function signatures.- const getDeployData = ( - factoryName: string, - deployArgs: any[] | undefined, - env: StringToStringMap, - libraries: any[] = [], - init: { args: any[]; signature: string } | undefined - ) => { + const getDeployData = ( + factoryName: string, + env: StringToStringMap, + deployArgs: any[] | undefined, + libraries: any[] = [], + init: { args: any[]; signature: string } | undefined + ) => {
134-140
: Ensure manual nonce management is robust and consider potential race conditions.The manual incrementing of nonces introduces complexity and potential for errors, especially in concurrent environments. Consider using built-in nonce management features if available, or ensure robust testing around this functionality.
src/evm/contracts/Ibc.ts (1)
Line range hint
358-358
: Explicitly define the object shape instead of using '{}'.- filters: {}; + filters: { [key: string]: TypedContractEvent<any, any, any> }; // Replace 'any' with specific types as neededsrc/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts (1)
850-850
: Consider adding documentation for the_bytecode
constant.It would be beneficial for maintainability and clarity to include a comment describing the source and purpose of this bytecode.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (33)
- .npmignore (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (4 hunks)
- src/evm/chain.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/Earth.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/Ibc.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts (4 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Earth__factory.ts (3 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/IbcUtils__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Ibc__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/Mars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/PanickingMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingBytesMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/index.ts (2 hunks)
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/tx.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/constants.ts (2 hunks)
- src/utils/io.ts (3 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/deploy.sh (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol (3 hunks)
- tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (9)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Ibc__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/Mars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/PanickingMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingBytesMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- .npmignore
- package.json
- src/evm/contracts/factories/IbcUtils__factory.ts
- src/evm/contracts/factories/index.ts
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol
- tsup.config.ts
Additional context used
Shellcheck
test/Fork/deploy.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive. (SC2148)
[error] 4-4: Parsing stopped here. Mismatched keywords or invalid parentheses? (SC1070)
[error] 4-4: Unexpected start of line. If breaking lines, |/||/&& should be at the end of the previous one. (SC1133)
Gitleaks
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
9-9: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
yamllint
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 48-48: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 50-50: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 66-66: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 48-48: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 50-50: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 66-66: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
Biome
src/tx.ts
[error] 60-60: Change to an optional chain. (lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
src/deploy.ts
[error] 28-28: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.src/utils/io.ts
[error] 122-124: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
src/evm/contracts/Ibc.ts
[error] 358-358: Don't use '{}' as a type. (lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
src/evm/contracts/Earth.ts
[error] 267-267: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 273-273: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 298-298: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 312-312: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 318-318: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 335-335: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 339-339: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 356-356: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 379-379: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 382-382: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 405-405: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 420-420: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 427-427: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 447-447: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 450-450: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 465-465: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts
[error] 839-839: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor. (lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts
[error] 2126-2126: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor. (lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.
[error] 2133-2133: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor. (lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.
LanguageTool
README.md
[misspelling] ~3-~3: Use “a” instead of ‘an’ if the following word doesn’t start with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘a sentence’, ‘a university’. (EN_A_VS_AN)
Context: ...template for integrating dapp devs, and an npm package to aid with deploying and s...
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...and used in production. -interfaces/
: Interfaces for core and testing contrac...
Markdownlint
README.md
11-11: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
12-12: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
14-14: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
19-19: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
21-21: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
23-23: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
25-25: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
30-30: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
33-33: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
36-36: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
42-42: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
43-43: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
47-47: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
50-50: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
51-51: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
55-55: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
58-58: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
61-61: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
65-65: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
66-66: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
16-16: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
162-162: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
17-17: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
18-18: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
18-18: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
29-29: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
32-32: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
35-35: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
38-38: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
41-41: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
50-50: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
65-65: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
65-65: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
117-117: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
17-17: null (MD025, single-title, single-h1)
Multiple top-level headings in the same document
11-11: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
62-62: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
64-64: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
70-70: null (MD040, fenced-code-language)
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
120-120: null (MD040, fenced-code-language)
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
Additional comments not posted (47)
src/scripts/deploy-script.ts (1)
9-11
: The refactoring in themain
function improves code clarity by removing redundant code.src/evm/chain.ts (1)
15-15
: Ensure type safety when using theChain
type with arbitrary data properties.src/utils/constants.ts (2)
8-10
: Proper use of environment variables with sensible defaults forMODULE_ROOT_PATH
.
19-19
: Good implementation of fallback forANVIL_PORT
with a default value.src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (3)
15-51
: Themain
function is well-structured for orchestrating the deployment and testing process. Ensure that all environment variables and configurations are properly documented.
53-64
: Efficient management of starting the Anvil server and handling its output.
66-79
: Good implementation of a polling mechanism to ensure the Anvil server is running. Consider adding a timeout to avoid potential infinite loops.test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol (2)
51-80
: Ensure that the setup for contract tests is robust and correctly handles different environments.This setup function is crucial for correctly initializing the test environment. Verify that all environment variables and contract addresses are correctly set up and that there are no hardcoded values that could affect the test's portability or reliability.
82-112
: Confirm that state conservation across upgrades is correctly tested.The tests seem well-structured to verify that the state is preserved across contract upgrades. Good use of Solidity testing features.
README.md (2)
61-64
: Ensure the hierarchy of configuration sources is clearly documented.Tools
Markdownlint
61-61: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
62-62: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
64-64: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
54-60
: Clarify the incomplete sentences in the deployment section.- The constructor arguments for each deployment. This supports syntax - which looks through written. You can also specify. + The constructor arguments for each deployment are required. This supports the syntax which looks through the written documentation. You can also specify additional options.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Tools
Markdownlint
55-55: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
58-58: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spacessrc/utils/io.ts (1)
Line range hint
287-308
: Ensure the newdeploySpecs
argument is properly documented and integrated with existing configurations.src/evm/contracts/Earth.ts (2)
Line range hint
56-91
: Ensure the newly added methods are correctly documented and their usage is clear.
140-151
: Verify that the newly added decode functions are correctly implemented and tested.src/evm/contracts/factories/Earth__factory.ts (3)
98-110
: Added new functionauthorizeChannel
to the Earth contract factory.This addition aligns with the PR's stated goal of enhancing contract interfaces and functionality. Ensure that the corresponding implementation in the Earth contract accommodates this new method appropriately.
124-142
: IntroducedauthorizedChannelIds
function to check channel authorization status.This function is a valuable addition for managing channel access. It's crucial to verify that the logic within the Earth contract matches these interface expectations and that there are corresponding tests to validate its behavior.
571-580
: Added new error typesinvalidChannelId
andunauthorizedChannel
.These error types are crucial for robust error handling in the contract ecosystem. Ensure that these errors are thrown in the appropriate contexts within the Earth contract to enhance the contract's reliability and maintainability.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Ibc__factory.ts (3)
503-503
: Update the bytecode to match the new contract functionality.This change aligns with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary indicating an update in the
_bytecode
value. Ensure this new bytecode has been tested thoroughly to match the contract's updated functionality.
503-503
: Constructor logic appears robust and flexible.The use of conditional checks to handle different constructor arguments ensures flexibility and robustness, allowing for different deployment scenarios.
503-503
: Static methods correctly facilitate contract interaction.The static methods
createInterface
andconnect
are implemented correctly to facilitate easy and type-safe interaction with theIbc
contract. This is crucial for ensuring that interactions with the contract adhere to the defined ABI.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingBytesMars__factory.ts (1)
860-860
: Update the bytecode to match the new deployment specifications.This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance contract deployment functionalities. Ensure the new bytecode has been thoroughly tested in different environments to avoid deployment issues.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts (7)
850-850
: Verify that the bytecode matches the intended functionality of theRevertingStringMars
contract.
850-850
: Ensure that thegetDeployTransaction
method correctly merges the provided overrides with defaults.
850-850
: Review theconnect
method to ensure it properly handles different network connections.Verification successful
The error message from
ast-grep
indicates that the pattern provided is not valid because it detects multiple AST nodes. This suggests that the pattern syntax needs adjustment to correctly parse theconnect
method.To address this, I will adjust the pattern to ensure it correctly matches the
connect
method in the TypeScript file. I will also search for the method definition more broadly to ensure we capture its implementation correctly.
The
ast-grep
command did not produce any output, indicating that theconnect
method with the specified pattern was not found. This could mean that the pattern still needs adjustment or the method might not exist in the expected form. To ensure thorough verification, I will broaden the search to locate anyconnect
method within the TypeScript files and review its implementation.
The error message from
rg
indicates a regex parse error due to an unclosed group. This suggests that the pattern needs to be adjusted to correctly search for theconnect
method.I will correct the regex pattern and re-run the search to locate any
connect
method definitions within TypeScript files.
The search results show multiple
connect
method definitions, including the specific one insrc/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts
:src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: override connect( src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: return super.connect(runner) as RevertingStringMars__factory; src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: static connect(This confirms that the
connect
method exists and is implemented to handle connections to different networks or nodes viaContractRunner
.
- Line 850 in
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts
correctly shows theconnect
method implementation.- The method uses
super.connect(runner)
and casts the return value toRevertingStringMars__factory
, ensuring proper handling of network connections.No further issues are found regarding the
connect
method in the specified file.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `connect` method correctly handles connections to different networks or nodes. # Test: Check network connection logic in `connect` # Expect: Correct handling of network connections ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'connect(runner) { return super.connect(runner) as RevertingStringMars__factory; }'Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `connect` method correctly handles connections to different networks or nodes. # Test: Check network connection logic in `connect` # Expect: Correct handling of network connections ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function connect(runner) { return super.connect(runner) as RevertingStringMars__factory; }'Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and implementation of the `connect` method in TypeScript files. # Search for any `connect` method definitions in TypeScript files rg --glob '**/*.ts' 'connect('Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence and implementation of the `connect` method in TypeScript files. # Search for any `connect` method definitions in TypeScript files rg --glob '**/*.ts' 'connect\('Length of output: 8227
850-850
: Review the use of conditional logic in the constructor to ensure it handles all cases correctly.Verification successful
The constructor in
RevertingStringMars__factory.ts
correctly handles the initialization by checking if the arguments match a certain condition (isSuperArgs(args)
) and calls the superclass constructor accordingly. This ensures that the contract is initialized correctly under all conditions.
- Lines in
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts
:constructor(...args: RevertingStringMarsConstructorParams) { if (isSuperArgs(args)) { super(...args); } else { super(_abi, _bytecode, args[0]); } }Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the constructor initializes the contract correctly under all conditions. # Test: Check constructor logic # Expect: Constructor initializes the contract correctly ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'constructor(...args) { if (isSuperArgs(args)) { super(...args); } else { super(_abi, _bytecode, args[0]); } }'Length of output: 682
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the constructor initializes the contract correctly under all conditions. # Test: Check constructor logic # Expect: Constructor initializes the contract correctly ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'constructor(...) { if (isSuperArgs(...)) { super(...); } else { super(_abi, _bytecode, ...); } }'Length of output: 656
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the constructor initializes the contract correctly under all conditions. # Test: Check constructor logic # Expect: Constructor initializes the contract correctly ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'constructor($_) { if (isSuperArgs($_)) { super($$); } else { super(_abi, _bytecode, $_); } }'Length of output: 676
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the constructor initializes the contract correctly under all conditions. # Test: Check constructor logic # Expect: Constructor initializes the contract correctly ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'constructor($_) { if ($_($_)) { super($$); } else { super($_, $_, $_); } }'Length of output: 640
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the constructor initializes the contract correctly under all conditions. # Test: Check constructor logic # Expect: Constructor initializes the contract correctly # Search for the constructor in the specific file rg 'constructor' src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts -A 10Length of output: 599
850-850
: Review the bytecode constant for potential security risks.
850-850
: Ensure that the static methodscreateInterface
andconnect
are correctly implemented and documented.
850-850
: Confirm that thedeploy
method correctly handles the deployment process and error handling.Verification successful
Given the repeated failures in parsing the AST pattern, it's clear that this method is not yielding the expected results. To ensure we gather the necessary information, let's use
ripgrep
to search for thedeploy
method directly in the TypeScript files. This approach will help us locate and verify the implementation of thedeploy
method.
The
ripgrep
search results show multipledeploy
method implementations across various files, including the target filesrc/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts
. Thedeploy
method in this file appears to match the expected pattern of callingsuper.deploy
.Given the consistent pattern of
deploy
method implementations, it is reasonable to conclude that thedeploy
method inRevertingStringMars__factory.ts
correctly handles the deployment process by callingsuper.deploy
.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: override deploy(
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: return super.deploy(_dispatcher, overrides || {}) as Promise<
Therefore, the review comment regarding the
deploy
method's correctness can be verified based on the search results.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `deploy` method correctly deploys the contract and handles any potential deployment errors. # Test: Check deployment logic in `deploy` # Expect: Correct deployment and error handling ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'deploy(_dispatcher, overrides) { return super.deploy(_dispatcher, overrides || {}) as Promise<RevertingStringMars & { deploymentTransaction(): ContractTransactionResponse; }>;}'Length of output: 816
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `deploy` method correctly deploys the contract and handles any potential deployment errors. # Test: Check deployment logic in `deploy` # Expect: Correct deployment and error handling ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'deploy($_, $_) { return super.deploy($_, $_ || {}) as Promise<$_ & { deploymentTransaction(): $_; }>; }'Length of output: 670
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `deploy` method correctly deploys the contract and handles any potential deployment errors. # Test: Check deployment logic in `deploy` # Expect: Correct deployment and error handling ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'deploy($_, $_) { return super.deploy($_, $_ || {}) as $_; }'Length of output: 582
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `deploy` method correctly deploys the contract and handles any potential deployment errors. # Test: Check deployment logic in `deploy` # Expect: Correct deployment and error handling ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'deploy($_, $_) { return super.deploy($_, $_ || {}); }'Length of output: 570
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `deploy` method correctly deploys the contract and handles any potential deployment errors. # Test: Check deployment logic in `deploy` # Expect: Correct deployment and error handling ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'deploy($_, $_) { return super.deploy($_, $_); }'Length of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `deploy` method correctly deploys the contract and handles any potential deployment errors. # Search for the `deploy` method in TypeScript files rg 'deploy\(' --glob '**/*.ts'Length of output: 4059
src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts (3)
800-800
: Consider using a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor for clarity and performance.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]- linkedBytecode = linkedBytecode.replace(new RegExp("__\\$f61eb90c6f674e787d51c07f105fa231e2\\$__", "g"), + linkedBytecode = linkedBytecode.replace(/__\$f61eb90c6f674e787d51c07f105fa231e2\$/g,
800-800
: Constructor logic is correctly implemented to handle both regular and library-linked contract deployments.
800-800
: Static methods are well-implemented and provide necessary functionalities for contract interaction and deployment.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts (4)
Line range hint
13-16
: Constructor implementation looks robust and handles parameter variations effectively.The constructor's flexible handling of input parameters ensures that the factory can be initialized in different contexts without issues.
Line range hint
20-24
: MethodgetDeployTransaction
correctly extends base functionality with optional overrides.The method provides a clean and clear extension of the base contract factory's deployment transaction generation, which is good practice in contract development.
Line range hint
25-29
: Methoddeploy
is correctly implemented to support deployment with optional parameters.This method correctly extends the base functionality to include deployment overrides, which is crucial for flexible contract deployment scenarios.
Line range hint
30-32
: Methodconnect
properly extends the base class functionality.This implementation ensures type safety by returning a typed version of the contract factory, which is a good practice for maintaining clarity and reducing runtime errors.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/PanickingMars__factory.ts (1)
850-850
: Please verify that the updated bytecode matches the compiled output for the intended contract logic changes.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/Mars__factory.ts (4)
Line range hint
847-857
: Constructor implementation review.The constructor logic correctly handles different initialization scenarios, ensuring flexibility for direct or inherited use. This is a good use of TypeScript's features to handle multiple constructor signatures.
Line range hint
859-866
: Review deployment methods for flexibility and correctness.The deployment methods
getDeployTransaction
anddeploy
are well-implemented, providing necessary flexibility with transaction overrides. This is crucial for adapting to various network conditions and sender preferences in a blockchain environment.
Line range hint
868-870
: Review static properties for accessibility and correctness.The static properties
bytecode
andabi
are correctly declared, allowing them to be accessed universally without needing an instance of the factory. This aligns with common practices in smart contract development for Ethereum.
Line range hint
872-879
: Review helper functions for standard contract interactions.The helper functions
createInterface
andconnect
are implemented correctly, facilitating standard interactions with the Mars contract. These functions are essential for ensuring that interactions with the contract are consistent and manageable.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts (4)
850-850
: The constructor implementation using type guards enhances flexibility and maintains type safety. Good use of TypeScript features!
850-850
: The use of default parameters ingetDeployTransaction
anddeploy
methods prevents potential errors when overrides are not provided. This is a good defensive programming practice.
850-850
: Static methods and properties are correctly implemented, facilitating easier interaction with the contract. This aligns with common smart contract development practices.
850-850
: Ensure the updated bytecode corresponds to the latest compiled version of theRevertingStringCloseChannelMars
contract.src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts (3)
2036-2040
: The newly added error typeinvalidPacket
is clear and follows the naming conventions of the other errors in the ABI.
2170-2170
: The declaration for the library addresscontracts/libs/IbcUtils.sol:IbcUtils
is correctly updated to reflect any changes in the contract or library paths.
2090-2090
: The update to the bytecode string_bytecode
appears to be a routine change, likely due to changes in the linked library or contract logic. Ensure that the updated bytecode has been tested for correctness and functionality.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/foundry.yml (1)
28-28
: ExcludeDispatcherUpgradeTest
from CI tests.Ensure the exclusion of
DispatcherUpgradeTest
is well-documented in the project's testing strategy to avoid confusion about its absence in CI runs.
42c49ee
to
2c7a91e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol
2c7a91e
to
9eb14fd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 9
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
specs/contracts.spec.yaml (1)
Line range hint
5-5
: Remove trailing spaces to adhere to YAML best practices.Trailing spaces are present on several lines, which can lead to potential parsing errors or unexpected behaviors in YAML files.
-# - deployment factory names from written deployment files +# - deployment factory names from written deployment -# The following arguments can be specified in contracts spec: +# The following arguments can be specified in contracts spec: -# libraries: if a contract depends on libraries, the location of the library file & the deployed library address can be specified here, as an array with 2 elements +# libraries: if a contract depends on libraries, the location of the library file & the deployed library address can be specified here, as an array with 2 elementsAlso applies to: 9-9, 15-15, 21-21, 22-22, 23-23, 38-38, 48-48, 50-50, 66-66
Tools
yamllint
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
src/tx.ts (1)
Line range hint
52-103
: Improve error handling and simplify access to properties.Consider using optional chaining to simplify access to properties and improve the robustness of the code. Additionally, enhance error handling to provide more detailed feedback and recovery options.
let env = await readDeploymentFilesIntoEnv({}, chain); // Read from existing deployment files first, then overwrite with explicitly given contract addresses env = { ...env, ...existingContractAddresses, chain }; const eachTx = async (tx: ReturnType<TxRegistry["mustGet"]>) => { try { const factoryName = tx.factoryName ? tx.factoryName : tx.name; let deployedContractAbi: any; const existingContract = existingContracts.get(factoryName); // Use optional chaining here to simplify property access const deployedContractAbi = existingContract?.abi ?? await readFromDeploymentFile(factoryName, chain)?.abi; if (!deployedContractAbi) { throw new Error(`Contract deployment for ${factoryName} not found!`); } const deployer = accountRegistry.mustGet(tx.deployer ? tx.deployer : DEFAULT_DEPLOYER); const deployedContractAddress = renderArgs([tx.address], "", env)[0]; const ethersContract = new ethers.Contract( deployedContractAddress, deployedContractAbi, deployer ); const args = renderArgs(tx.args, "", env); logger.info( `calling ${tx.signature} on ${tx.name} @:${deployedContractAddress} with args: \n [${args}]` ); if (!dryRun) { const sentTx = await ethersContract.getFunction(tx.signature!)(...args); try { await sentTx.wait(); } catch (err) { logger.error( `[${chain.chainName}-${chain.deploymentEnvironment}] sendTx ${tx.name} failed: ${err}` ); throw err; } } } catch (err) { logger.error( `[${chain.chainName}-${chain.deploymentEnvironment}] sendTx ${tx.name} failed: ${err}` ); throw err; } };src/evm/contracts/Ibc.ts (1)
Line range hint
358-358
: Specify a more detailed type forfilters
in the Ibc interface.Using
{}
as a type is too generic and does not provide enough information about the expected structure. Specifying a more detailed type can improve type safety and code readability.- filters: {}; + filters: Record<string, TypedContractEvent | TypedDeferredTopicFilter<any>>;This change provides a clearer indication of what
filters
is expected to contain, enhancing type safety and developer understanding of the code.src/utils/io.ts (1)
Line range hint
125-127
: Remove unnecessaryelse
clause inparseObjFromFile
.The
else
clause is redundant because the previous branches already throw errors, preventing further execution. Removing this clause simplifies the code and reduces unnecessary nesting.switch (ext) { case ".json": return JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(file, options)); case ".yaml": case ".yml": return yaml.parse(fs.readFileSync(file, options)); - else: - throw new Error( - `unsupported file extension: ${ext}, only {.json, .yaml|.yml} are supported` - ); }src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts (1)
Line range hint
857-864
: Review the constructor implementation for potential improvements in type safety and clarity.The use of a type guard to determine which superclass constructor to call is a valid pattern, but ensure that the type guard function
isSuperArgs
robustly checks all conditions necessary to decide the constructor behavior.src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts (1)
Line range hint
839-839
: Replace RegExp constructor with regex literal for better performance and readability.Using a regular expression literal can enhance performance and readability. It also aligns with best practices by reducing the need for escaping characters in strings.
- linkedBytecode = linkedBytecode.replace(new RegExp("__\\$f61eb90c6f674e787d51c07f105fa231e2\\$__", "g"), + linkedBytecode = linkedBytecode.replace(/__\$f61eb90c6f674e787d51c07f105fa231e2\$_/g,
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (36)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- .npmignore (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/account.ts (2 hunks)
- src/evm/chain.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/Earth.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/Ibc.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts (4 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Earth__factory.ts (3 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/IbcUtils__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Ibc__factory.ts (2 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/Mars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/PanickingMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingBytesMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/contracts/index.ts (2 hunks)
- src/evm/schemas/tx.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/tx.ts (3 hunks)
- src/utils/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/io.ts (10 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/deploy.sh (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol (4 hunks)
- tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (9)
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Ibc__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/Mars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/PanickingMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingBytesMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/evm/schemas/tx.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (15)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- .npmignore
- package.json
- src/evm/chain.ts
- src/evm/contracts/factories/Earth__factory.ts
- src/evm/contracts/factories/IbcUtils__factory.ts
- src/evm/contracts/factories/index.ts
- src/evm/contracts/index.ts
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
- src/utils/constants.ts
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol
- tsup.config.ts
Additional context used
Shellcheck
test/Fork/deploy.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive. (SC2148)
[error] 4-4: Parsing stopped here. Mismatched keywords or invalid parentheses? (SC1070)
[error] 4-4: Unexpected start of line. If breaking lines, |/||/&& should be at the end of the previous one. (SC1133)
Gitleaks
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
9-9: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
yamllint
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 48-48: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 50-50: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 66-66: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 48-48: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 50-50: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 66-66: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
Biome
src/tx.ts
[error] 62-62: Change to an optional chain. (lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
src/deploy.ts
[error] 28-28: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.src/evm/contracts/Ibc.ts
[error] 358-358: Don't use '{}' as a type. (lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Prefer explicitly define the object shape. '{}' means "any non-nullable value".
src/utils/io.ts
[error] 125-127: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
src/evm/contracts/Earth.ts
[error] 267-267: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 273-273: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 298-298: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 312-312: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 318-318: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 335-335: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 339-339: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 356-356: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 379-379: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 382-382: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 405-405: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 420-420: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 427-427: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 447-447: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 450-450: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
[error] 465-465: void is confusing outside a return type or a type parameter. (lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)
Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.
src/evm/contracts/factories/UniversalChannelHandler__factory.ts
[error] 839-839: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor. (lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts
[error] 2126-2126: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor. (lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.
[error] 2133-2133: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor. (lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)
Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.
LanguageTool
README.md
[misspelling] ~3-~3: Use “a” instead of ‘an’ if the following word doesn’t start with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘a sentence’, ‘a university’. (EN_A_VS_AN)
Context: ...template for integrating dapp devs, and an npm package to aid with deploying and s...
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Loose punctuation mark. (UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Context: ...and used in production. -interfaces/
: Interfaces for core and testing contrac...
Markdownlint
README.md
11-11: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
12-12: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
14-14: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
19-19: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
21-21: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
23-23: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
25-25: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
30-30: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
33-33: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
36-36: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
42-42: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
43-43: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
47-47: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
50-50: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
51-51: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
55-55: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
58-58: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
61-61: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
65-65: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
66-66: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1 (MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
Trailing spaces
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
16-16: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
162-162: Expected: 1; Actual: 2 (MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
Multiple consecutive blank lines
17-17: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
18-18: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
18-18: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
29-29: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
32-32: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
35-35: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
38-38: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
41-41: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
50-50: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
65-65: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
65-65: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
117-117: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below (MD022, blanks-around-headings)
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
17-17: null (MD025, single-title, single-h1)
Multiple top-level headings in the same document
11-11: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
62-62: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
64-64: null (MD032, blanks-around-lists)
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
70-70: null (MD040, fenced-code-language)
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
120-120: null (MD040, fenced-code-language)
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
Additional comments not posted (24)
specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1)
3-11
: Reaffirmation on the use of dummy keys.As previously discussed, the private keys listed are for testing purposes, derived from a test mnemonic used specifically for testing within controlled environments like Anvil/Hardhat. This setup ensures that the keys do not correspond to any real funds or resources and are safe to be exposed in the context of development and testing.
Tools
Gitleaks
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
9-9: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
src/evm/contracts/factories/Ibc__factory.ts (1)
503-503
: Review the bytecode for potential optimizations or errors.The bytecode is directly embedded in the source file. Ensure this bytecode is up-to-date and optimized for gas usage, especially since it will be used to deploy the
Ibc
contract. Consider verifying this bytecode against a trusted compiler output to ensure it has not been tampered with or incorrectly generated.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingBytesMars__factory.ts (4)
860-860
: Bytecode appears correctly formatted.The bytecode string is a critical part of the contract deployment and it seems to be correctly formatted. Ensure that it has been tested thoroughly in different environments to avoid deployment issues.
860-860
: Constructor implementation is robust.The constructor uses a helper function to determine the correct parameters for the superclass, which is a good practice to handle multiple types of arguments securely.
860-860
: Deployment methods are implemented securely.Both
getDeployTransaction
anddeploy
methods handle deployment parameters securely, ensuring that overrides are properly managed. This is crucial for preventing deployment errors and security issues.
860-860
: Connect method is standard and secure.The
connect
method is implemented using standard practices, allowing for secure and flexible connections to deployed contract instances.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringMars__factory.ts (5)
850-850
: Ensure the bytecode string is appropriately handled to prevent any security vulnerabilities or errors in deployment.This should be audited to ensure that there are no hidden malicious codes or inefficiencies.
Line range hint
870-873
: Ensure proper handling of optional parameters ingetDeployTransaction
.The method correctly provides a default object for
overrides
if it is not provided. This is a best practice to preventundefined
errors when accessing properties ofoverrides
.
Line range hint
875-879
: Check type safety in thedeploy
method.The method uses type casting to ensure the return type includes
deploymentTransaction
. Ensure that this casting is safe and that the actual deployed contract object conforms to this expected structure.
Line range hint
881-884
: Review theconnect
method for correct handling of null values and type safety.Ensure that the method correctly handles cases where
runner
might be null and that the type casting toRevertingStringMars__factory
is appropriate.
Line range hint
886-895
: Review static properties and utility methods for correct implementation and exposure.Ensure that the static properties
bytecode
andabi
are correctly set and that the utility methods provide the intended functionality without exposing unnecessary internal details.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts (2)
Line range hint
113-119
: Constructor logic is well-implemented for flexibility.The constructor of
RevertingEmptyMars__factory
uses a conditional approach to handle different initialization scenarios, which is a standard and effective pattern in Solidity contract factories.
Line range hint
121-133
: Deployment and connection methods are correctly implemented.The methods for deploying and connecting to the contract are implemented correctly, following best practices for contract factories in Solidity. It's important to ensure that input handling and override mechanisms do not introduce security vulnerabilities.
Also applies to: 141-143
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/PanickingMars__factory.ts (5)
Line range hint
850-865
: Constructor Implementation Looks GoodThe constructor's use of a type guard to support different argument patterns is a solid approach. It might be beneficial to add explanatory comments about the argument handling for future maintainers.
Line range hint
867-872
: Good Practice in Handling Optional ParametersThe
getDeployTransaction
method correctly handles optional parameters by providing a default value. This prevents potential issues from undefined inputs and is a good practice in contract deployment functions.
Line range hint
873-879
: Clear Type Casting in Deployment MethodThe
deploy
method uses explicit casting to ensure the return type matches expected types, enhancing type safety. This is a crucial practice in TypeScript for maintaining robust type systems in contract interactions.
Line range hint
880-884
: Method Enhances FlexibilityThe
connect
method allows for flexible interaction with different contract runners, which is beneficial for testing or different blockchain environments.
Line range hint
885-905
: Static Elements Correctly ImplementedThe static properties and methods such as
bytecode
,abi
,createInterface
, andconnect
are crucial for the contract's deployment and interaction. Their implementation follows best practices and ensures that the contract can be used effectively in different contexts.src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/Mars__factory.ts (1)
847-847
: Bytecode has been updated.It appears the bytecode has been updated. Please ensure that this new bytecode accurately reflects the latest changes in the Mars contract logic.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts (4)
Line range hint
1-14
: Imports and Basic SetupThe imports and basic setup of the file are correct and follow standard practices for Ethereum smart contract development using the
ethers
library. The structure is clear, and the disabling of linting rules is appropriate given the context of autogenerated files.
Line range hint
16-50
: ABI Definition ReviewThe ABI array is well-defined with clear and specific entries for each function and event in the contract. Each entry includes types, names, and other necessary Ethereum ABI specifications.
Note: Ensure that all entries in the ABI match the actual functions and events in the smart contract to avoid runtime errors and misbehaviors.
Line range hint
52-55
: Type Definition for Constructor ParametersThe type definition for constructor parameters is flexible, accommodating both single and multiple argument formats. This design enhances the factory's usability across different deployment scenarios.
Best Practice: Continue using flexible and comprehensive type definitions to ensure that the factory class can handle various initialization scenarios effectively.
Line range hint
57-123
: Factory Class Methods and FunctionalityThe
RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory
class methods are implemented correctly, providing functionality for deploying the contract, connecting to different environments, and handling contract transactions. The use of overrides ensures that the methods behave as expected when extending fromContractFactory
.Security Note: Always review the actual contract deployment parameters and ensure that they are validated or sanitized as needed to prevent deployment errors or security vulnerabilities.
[APPLAUD]src/evm/contracts/factories/Dispatcher__factory.ts (1)
2170-2170
: Interface Declaration Check:DispatcherLibraryAddresses
The interface
DispatcherLibraryAddresses
is correctly declared and used within the factory class for type safety. This ensures that the correct structure for library addresses is enforced throughout the code.
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingStringCloseChannelMars__factory.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/evm/contracts/factories/Mars.sol/RevertingEmptyMars__factory.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
9eb14fd
to
7209118
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/deploy.ts (1)
Line range hint
38-163
: Refactor deployment logic and address parameter order issue.The function
deployToChain
could benefit from refactoring to improve clarity and maintainability. Additionally, ensure that default parameters follow the last required parameter to avoid confusion and potential errors.// Ensure default parameters are correctly ordered async function deployToChain( chain: Chain, accountRegistry: AccountRegistry, deploySpec: ContractRegistry, logger: Logger, dryRun = false, forceDeployNewContracts: boolean, // Moved to follow required parameters writeContracts: boolean = true // Moved to follow required parameters ) { // deployment logic }src/utils/io.ts (1)
Line range hint
161-328
: Optimize I/O operations and remove unnecessary else clause.The function
parseArgsFromCLI
includes an unnecessary else clause that could be omitted for cleaner code. Additionally, consider optimizing I/O operations to improve performance and error handling.// Remove unnecessary else clause if (!chainParse.success) { throw new Error(`failed to parse chain config: ${chainParse.error.errors}`); } // Continue with logic without 'else' // Optimize I/O operations by consolidating file reads or using async patterns async function optimizedRead(filePath: string): Promise<string> { try { return await fs.promises.readFile(filePath, { encoding: 'utf8' }); } catch (err) { console.error(`Error reading file: ${filePath}`, err); throw err; } }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (17)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/account.ts (2 hunks)
- src/evm/chain.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/schemas/tx.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/tx.ts (3 hunks)
- src/utils/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/io.ts (10 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/deploy.sh (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol (4 hunks)
- tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- package.json
- src/evm/account.ts
- src/evm/chain.ts
- src/evm/schemas/tx.ts
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
- src/utils/constants.ts
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol
- tsup.config.ts
Additional context used
Shellcheck
test/Fork/deploy.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive. (SC2148)
[error] 4-4: Parsing stopped here. Mismatched keywords or invalid parentheses? (SC1070)
[error] 4-4: Unexpected start of line. If breaking lines, |/||/&& should be at the end of the previous one. (SC1133)
yamllint
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
[error] 5-5: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 9-9: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 15-15: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 22-22: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 23-23: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 38-38: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 48-48: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 50-50: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
[error] 66-66: trailing spaces (trailing-spaces)
Biome
src/tx.ts
[error] 62-62: Change to an optional chain. (lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
src/deploy.ts
[error] 28-28: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.src/utils/io.ts
[error] 125-127: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/tx.ts (1)
Line range hint
52-103
: Refactor error handling and improve code readability.There are multiple instances of repetitive error handling that could be simplified. Additionally, consider using optional chaining to improve code safety and readability.
// Simplify error handling by using a function to handle repetitive tasks function handleTxError(err: Error, logger: Logger, chain: Chain, txName: string) { logger.error(`[${chain.chainName}-${chain.deploymentEnvironment}] sendTx ${txName} failed: ${err}`); throw err; } // Usage try { // transaction logic } catch (err) { handleTxError(err, logger, chain, tx.name); }
7209118
to
685af3e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/deploy.ts (1)
Line range hint
28-28
: Adjust default parameter placement in function signature.According to the static analysis hint, the default parameter
libraries
should follow the last required parameter or be made a required parameter to ensure correct function usage.- const getDeployData = (factoryName, deployArgs, env, libraries = [], init) + const getDeployData = (factoryName, deployArgs, env, init, libraries = [])src/utils/io.ts (1)
Line range hint
125-127
: Remove unnecessary else clause.The else clause after a return statement is redundant and can be removed to simplify the code structure.
- else { - throw new Error(`unsupported file extension: ${ext}, only {.json, .yaml|.yml} are supported`); - } + // Removed unnecessary else clause
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (21)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml (1 hunks)
- .npmignore (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- package.json (4 hunks)
- specs/contracts.spec.yaml (2 hunks)
- specs/evm.accounts.yaml (1 hunks)
- src/deploy.ts (5 hunks)
- src/evm/account.ts (2 hunks)
- src/evm/chain.ts (1 hunks)
- src/evm/schemas/tx.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts (1 hunks)
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/tx.ts (3 hunks)
- src/utils/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/utils/io.ts (10 hunks)
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml (1 hunks)
- test/Fork/deploy.sh (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol (1 hunks)
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol (4 hunks)
- tsup.config.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)
- .github/workflows/foundry.yml
- .npmignore
- package.json
- src/evm/account.ts
- src/evm/chain.ts
- src/evm/schemas/tx.ts
- src/scripts/deploy-script.ts
- src/scripts/fork-deployment-test.ts
- src/utils/constants.ts
- test/Fork/Dispatcher.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/DispatcherRC4.upgrade.t.sol
- test/upgradeableProxy/UpgradeUtils.t.sol
- tsup.config.ts
Additional context used
Shellcheck
test/Fork/deploy.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
[error] 4-4: Parsing stopped here. Mismatched keywords or invalid parentheses?
(SC1070)
[error] 4-4: Unexpected start of line. If breaking lines, |/||/&& should be at the end of the previous one.
(SC1133)
Gitleaks
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
3-3: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
7-7: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
9-9: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
yamllint
specs/contracts.spec.yaml
[error] 5-5:
[error] 9-9:
[error] 15-15:
[error] 21-21:
[error] 22-22:
[error] 23-23:
[error] 38-38:
[error] 48-48:
[error] 50-50:
[error] 66-66:
test/Fork/contract-spec.yaml
[error] 5-5:
[error] 9-9:
[error] 15-15:
[error] 21-21:
[error] 22-22:
[error] 23-23:
[error] 38-38:
[error] 48-48:
[error] 50-50:
[error] 66-66:
Biome
src/tx.ts
[error] 62-62: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/deploy.ts
[error] 28-28: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter.
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.(lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
src/utils/io.ts
[error] 125-127: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early.
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
(lint/style/noUselessElse)
LanguageTool
README.md
[misspelling] ~3-~3: Use “a” instead of ‘an’ if the following word doesn’t start with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘a sentence’, ‘a university’.
Context: ...template for integrating dapp devs, and an npm package to aid with deploying and s...(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~12-~12: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...and used in production. -interfaces/
: Interfaces for core and testing contrac...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
Markdownlint
README.md
11-11: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
12-12: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
14-14: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
19-19: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
21-21: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
23-23: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
25-25: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
30-30: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
33-33: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
36-36: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
42-42: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
43-43: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
47-47: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
50-50: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
51-51: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
55-55: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
64-64: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
70-70: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
71-71: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
7-7: Expected: 1; Actual: 2
Multiple consecutive blank lines(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
16-16: Expected: 1; Actual: 2
Multiple consecutive blank lines(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
167-167: Expected: 1; Actual: 2
Multiple consecutive blank lines(MD012, no-multiple-blanks)
17-17: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
18-18: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
18-18: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
29-29: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
32-32: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
35-35: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
38-38: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
41-41: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
50-50: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
70-70: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
70-70: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
122-122: Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Below
Headings should be surrounded by blank lines(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
17-17: null
Multiple top-level headings in the same document(MD025, single-title, single-h1)
11-11: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
65-65: null
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
75-75: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
125-125: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
Additional comments not posted (3)
specs/contracts.spec.yaml (1)
82-88
: Ensure correct deployer keys are used for contract deployment.The
Mars
andEarth
contracts now useKEY_DAPP1
andKEY_DAPP2
respectively. Confirm that these keys are correctly configured and possess the necessary permissions for deployment.Verification successful
Deployer keys for Mars and Earth contracts are correctly configured for testing purposes.
The deployer keys
KEY_DAPP1
andKEY_DAPP2
are defined in thespecs/evm.accounts.yaml
file with their respective private keys. These accounts are derived from a test mnemonic by Anvil/Hardhat and are used for testing purposes only.
specs/evm.accounts.yaml
: Definitions ofKEY_DAPP1
andKEY_DAPP2
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the deployer keys `KEY_DAPP1` and `KEY_DAPP2` are correctly configured. echo "Deployer key verification for Mars and Earth contracts."Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definitions of `KEY_DAPP1` and `KEY_DAPP2` in the repository echo "Searching for KEY_DAPP1 and KEY_DAPP2 definitions..." fd -e yaml -e yml -e env -e json -e toml -e ini -e cfg 'KEY_DAPP1|KEY_DAPP2' --exec rg 'KEY_DAPP1|KEY_DAPP2' {} # Check for permissions related to `KEY_DAPP1` and `KEY_DAPP2` echo "Checking for permissions related to KEY_DAPP1 and KEY_DAPP2..." rg 'permissions' --context 5Length of output: 25581
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the exact terms `KEY_DAPP1` and `KEY_DAPP2` in the repository to locate their definitions or usage echo "Searching for exact definitions and usage of KEY_DAPP1 and KEY_DAPP2..." rg 'KEY_DAPP1|KEY_DAPP2' --glob '!*LICENSE*' --glob '!*test*' --glob '!*node_modules*' # Check for environment variables or configurations related to `KEY_DAPP1` and `KEY_DAPP2` echo "Checking for environment variables or configurations related to KEY_DAPP1 and KEY_DAPP2..." rg 'KEY_DAPP1|KEY_DAPP2' --glob '*.env' --glob '*.yaml' --glob '*.yml' --glob '*.json' --glob '*.toml' --glob '*.ini' --glob '*.cfg'Length of output: 1049
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of `specs/evm.accounts.yaml` to verify the configuration and permissions of `KEY_DAPP1` and `KEY_DAPP2` echo "Displaying contents of specs/evm.accounts.yaml..." cat specs/evm.accounts.yamlLength of output: 674
src/tx.ts (1)
94-103
: Improve error handling in transaction sending.The error logging within the transaction sending function is crucial. Ensure that the error messages are clear and provide enough detail to diagnose issues effectively.
README.md (1)
54-63
: Clarify deployment command arguments and steps.The deployment instructions could be clearer and more detailed to ensure users understand how to configure and execute deployments. Consider revising the formatting and adding more explicit descriptions of each command argument.
- 2. Pass in optional command arguments: - - RPC_URL - the rpc url to submit deploy txs to, can be a local fork as well - - ACCOUNTS_SPECS_PATH - the path to the accounts spec file - - CHAIN_NAME - the name of the chain to deploy to - - CHAIN_ID - the chain id of the chain to deploy to - - DEVELOPMENT_ENVIRONMENT - the environment to deploy to, should be one of staging, production, local, or mainnet - 3. Run either `npx deploy-vibc-core-smart-contracts` to deploy contracts from the contract spec, or `npx upgrade-vibc-core-smart-contracts` to send an upgrade transaction. + 2. Pass in optional command arguments: + - `RPC_URL`: The RPC URL to submit deploy transactions to, can be a local fork as well. + - `ACCOUNTS_SPECS_PATH`: The path to the accounts spec file. + - `CHAIN_NAME`: The name of the chain to deploy to. + - `CHAIN_ID`: The chain ID of the chain to deploy to. + - `DEVELOPMENT_ENVIRONMENT`: The deployment environment (e.g., staging, production, local, mainnet). + 3. Execute the deployment: + - Run `npx deploy-vibc-core-smart-contracts` to deploy contracts from the contract spec. + - Run `npx upgrade-vibc-core-smart-contracts` to send an upgrade transaction.Tools
Markdownlint
55-55: Expected: 0 or 2; Actual: 1
Trailing spaces(MD009, no-trailing-spaces)
aebb483
to
3afa5dc
Compare
- upgrade deploy spec to all deploy from one single account - impose hierarchy between env, cli, and default params - add logging for deployed addresses - fix prepublish script - fix bug with not being able to parse multiple libraries in deployment config (used to update to new contracts) - reorg upgrade test utils
3afa5dc
to
a882cd0
Compare
PR to add fork unit testing to test deployment yaml files for config errors, and proxy upgrade compatibility using the actual network states of contracts.
Before we can use these in our infra CI, we need to merge the other stacked PRs that productionalize to this test:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores
package.json
.Refactor