This repository has been archived by the owner on May 9, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
longtomjr
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 18, 2021 18:19
9b8dfcc
to
b1bc710
Compare
longtomjr
added
M: auth enclave
Module: Authorisation enclave (rtc_auth_enclave)
M: data enclave
Module: Data enclave (rtc_data_enclave)
feat
New feature or request
labels
May 18, 2021
PiDelport
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 20, 2021 19:20
b1bc710
to
589a029
Compare
I rebased and resolved the conflicts, so long: I'll tackle the review next. |
longtomjr
commented
May 21, 2021
longtomjr
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 25, 2021 13:29
589a029
to
999d4e0
Compare
PiDelport
reviewed
May 26, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hefty review, but done! 🎉
PiDelport
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 27, 2021 12:48
999d4e0
to
92952de
Compare
Rebased and updated for #80:
This simplifies the |
longtomjr
commented
May 28, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes looks good! Thanks
PiDelport
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 28, 2021 12:48
652d2a7
to
5f1cb5e
Compare
PiDelport
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 28, 2021 13:03
1985ee9
to
5f1cb5e
Compare
This will avoid pulling in post-sgx_1.1.3 revisions unexpectedly.
…ence This is more consistent with the surrounding code.
PiDelport
force-pushed
the
he-local-attestation
branch
from
May 28, 2021 14:21
41e6643
to
5b6f3d5
Compare
…GcmIvConstructor Also add additional documentation and context around the IV construction.
PiDelport
reviewed
May 31, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant to push the remaining changes before this got merged, but missed the window, sorry! I pushed a quick follow-up PR: #85
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
feat
New feature or request
M: auth enclave
Module: Authorisation enclave (rtc_auth_enclave)
M: data enclave
Module: Data enclave (rtc_data_enclave)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #34