Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Community Data Badge tokens of Utrecht #821

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

jeffreylauwers
Copy link
Contributor

  • Added Community Data Badge tokens of Utrecht.
  • Removed todo Bagde Data tokens.

@jeffreylauwers jeffreylauwers requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 11:44
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
themes ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 13, 2024 11:47am

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.50%. Comparing base (a923014) to head (a8d9ca7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #821   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.50%   89.50%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1325     1325           
  Branches      171      175    +4     
=======================================
  Hits         1186     1186           
+ Misses        139      138    -1     
- Partials        0        1    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Yolijn Yolijn merged commit 5321f03 into main Nov 13, 2024
7 checks passed
@Yolijn Yolijn deleted the style/add-community-data-badge-tokens-utrecht branch November 13, 2024 12:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants