Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/matches set #58

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

Feature/matches set #58

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

niklak
Copy link
Owner

@niklak niklak commented Jan 16, 2025

  • Switch from using NodeIdSet to InnerHashSet<usize>, since using usize is somehow a little bit more efficient than NodeId.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Chores

    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to focus on code auditing
    • Refined internal type management for hash sets and node identifiers
  • Documentation

    • Updated inline comment for link detection method to better describe performance characteristics
  • Refactor

    • Replaced HashSetFx and NodeIdSet type aliases with InnerHashSet

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a series of modifications across multiple files in a Rust project, primarily focusing on refactoring type aliases and data structures related to hash sets and node identifiers. The changes involve renaming a GitHub Actions workflow job, updating type aliases in entities.rs, modifying how node identifiers are managed in matcher.rs, adjusting import statements in node_data.rs, and making a minor comment change in selector.rs.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/audit.yml Renamed job from "build" to "audit"
src/entities.rs - Removed NodeIdSet and HashSetFx<K> type aliases
- Added InnerHashSet<K> type alias
- Updated public exports
src/matcher.rs Updated Matches struct to use InnerHashSet<usize> instead of NodeIdSet
src/node/node_data.rs Replaced HashSetFx imports with InnerHashSet in multiple methods
src/node/selector.rs Modified comment for is_link method to reduce overhead description

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Refactoring Rhyme 🐰

In workflows and types, we dance and we play,
Renaming our sets in a code-crafting way
From HashSetFx to InnerSet we leap
Our identifiers now organized, neat
A rabbit's code audit, precise and so bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8d3c4d and 70fb9f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/audit.yml (1 hunks)
  • src/entities.rs (1 hunks)
  • src/matcher.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/node/node_data.rs (4 hunks)
  • src/node/selector.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/audit.yml
  • src/node/selector.rs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/entities.rs (1)

4-4: LGTM! Clean and consistent type alias changes.

The introduction of InnerHashSet<K> and its exports are implemented consistently across both hashbrown and non-hashbrown configurations.

Also applies to: 11-11, 15-15

src/node/node_data.rs (1)

10-10: LGTM! Consistent usage of InnerHashSet across methods.

The migration from HashSetFx to InnerHashSet is applied consistently across all relevant methods (add_class, remove_class, add_attrs_if_missing) without introducing any behavioral changes.

Also applies to: 114-114, 159-159, 233-233

src/matcher.rs (2)

10-10: LGTM! Type change aligns with efficiency goals.

The switch to InnerHashSet<usize> aligns with the PR objective of enhancing efficiency.

Also applies to: 55-55


109-109: Verify NodeId value access safety.

The direct access to node.id.value assumes that NodeId is always valid. Please ensure that NodeId cannot be null or invalid at this point.

Also applies to: 119-119


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.85%. Comparing base (e8d3c4d) to head (70fb9f0).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #58   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.85%   91.85%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        2577     2577           
=======================================
  Hits         2367     2367           
  Misses        210      210           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@niklak niklak merged commit 15b936a into main Jan 16, 2025
11 checks passed
@niklak niklak deleted the feature/matches-set branch January 16, 2025 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant