-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor utils modules before migrating to TS. #3870
Conversation
Status
|
eeb3770
to
ffe0fa8
Compare
lib/utils/logger/log_settings.js
Outdated
} | ||
class LogSettings { | ||
constructor() { | ||
this.__outputEnabled = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of __outputEnabled
, we should use #outputEnabled
.
Ref: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Classes/Private_class_fields
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no problem with either notations, it's just that __
notation is what we're using everywhere in the Nightwatch project, and because we are anyway going to convert this file to TS just after this PR is merged where we'll use the private
keyword, using/not using #
doesn't really matter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. Needed to update eslint to work with # as well. But not sure if # is supported in Node.js 16, let's see.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, it seems that they are available since Node.js 12, but I wonder why it was only implemented in ECMAScript 2022?
Co-authored-by: Vaibhav Singh <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vaibhav Singh <[email protected]>
… into utils-refactor
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ | |||
"eslint:recommended" | |||
], | |||
"parserOptions": { | |||
"ecmaVersion": 2020, | |||
"ecmaVersion": 13, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I couldn't find 13
in the documentation. We can use latest
to use the latest environment parser in ESLint.
Ref: https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/configure/language-options#specifying-environments
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
13
is present in inline documentation, which is same as setting it to 2022
.
I didn't specify latest
because earlier also 2020
version was mentioned instead of latest
and I'm not sure of the reason for that, but I suppose it's so that any changes in ESLint do not affect us, as long as we don't explicitly decide to move to a new version ourselves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@beatfactor Can you please look into this once, if it is fine to use latest
or should we just keep to a specific version?
Also, please review and merge this PR afterwards, as it is a blocker for migrating the utils/logger
module.
No description provided.