Added std::common_type<T, T> specialization to ensure the return type…

[Guillaume227]

Added std::common_type<T, T> specialization to ensure the return type off arithmetic operators matches the input type when the two inputs have the same type. That fixes ternary operator use cases. See #313

[JohelEGP]

Returning the same type as the template parameters would regress returning the GCD of the conversion factors, like https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/duration/common_type.

For example, let D be std::duration<int, std::ratio<2, 2>>. std::common_type_t<D, D> should be std::duration<int> (with period std::ratio<1>), not D.

[Guillaume227]

Ok thanks for raising this subtlety, which is not covered by the current test suite.
I am going to need to think about how to factor that in.
For reference, here is the error I am trying to fix when using the ternary operator:
auto deg = true ? degrees<double>(1) : degrees<double>(2) - degrees<double>(90);

/home/ggiraud/mcaura/units/unitTests/main.cpp:657:25: error: operands to ‘?:’ have different types 
‘units::angle::degrees<double>’ {aka ‘units::unit<units::angle::degrees_, double, units::linear_scale>’} and 
‘std::common_type_t<units::unit<units::angle::degrees_, double, units::linear_scale>, units::unit<units::angle::degrees_, double, 
units::linear_scale> >’ {aka ‘units::unit<units::conversion_factor<std::ratio<1, 180>, 
units::dimension_t<units::dim<units::dimension::angle_tag, std::ratio<1, 1> > >, std::ratio<1>, std::ratio<0> >, double, 
units::linear_scale>’}

[nholthaus]

note to self: I think this can be done, need to get the GCD of the conversion factors and add a test case that we're doing it right similar to Johel's

[nholthaus]

added with tests to ensure gcd