Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 13-4.cgel #26

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Update 13-4.cgel #26

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

mebwells
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@bwaldon
Copy link
Collaborator

bwaldon commented Aug 15, 2024

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
:Subj (NP
:Det (NP
:Head (Nom
:Head (N_pro :t "its")))
:Head (N_pro :t "its" :l "it")))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we have been using :l for pronouns (you can double-check in CGELBank)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've been seeing :l for only possessive pronouns in the twitter examples, but I can stop using it if that would be preferable

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, it's inconsistent in CGELBank so either way is OK for now. I've opened an issue for making it consistent: nert-nlp/cgel/issues/128

@bwaldon
Copy link
Collaborator

bwaldon commented Sep 3, 2024

For more on by-PP complements in nominals, section 5.4.1 of SIEG (p. 128):

Screenshot 2024-09-03 at 5 28 43 AM

@bwaldon bwaldon merged commit 7b7b48a into main Sep 3, 2024
@nschneid
Copy link
Contributor

nschneid commented Sep 3, 2024

What's the rationale for the high attachment of the purpose clause modifier ("meeting to conduct...")?

@bwaldon
Copy link
Collaborator

bwaldon commented Sep 3, 2024

@mebwells will open a new PR on the tree
@bwaldon will also make explicit in the guidelines: we have a default preference for low right attachment.

@bwaldon
Copy link
Collaborator

bwaldon commented Sep 4, 2024

#49

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants