-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 13-4.cgel #26
Update 13-4.cgel #26
Conversation
|
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ | |||
:Subj (NP | |||
:Det (NP | |||
:Head (Nom | |||
:Head (N_pro :t "its"))) | |||
:Head (N_pro :t "its" :l "it"))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we have been using :l
for pronouns (you can double-check in CGELBank)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've been seeing :l for only possessive pronouns in the twitter examples, but I can stop using it if that would be preferable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, it's inconsistent in CGELBank so either way is OK for now. I've opened an issue for making it consistent: nert-nlp/cgel/issues/128
Removed redundant lemma tags
What's the rationale for the high attachment of the purpose clause modifier ("meeting to conduct...")? |
No description provided.