-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
Neper FEPX Development Workflow
This document presents the (rather basic) development workflow of the Neper and FEPX free / open-source programs (herein the program). Although the text is written specifically for Neper and FEPX and is aimed at the (new) developers of the program (who may also be new to collaborative software development), with links to websites that the reader may or may not have access to, the workflow should be applicable to any other (medium-size) program.
Development is made with tools and procedures based on Git and GitHub. The program is made available on the Web as source code, and its developement involves both public and private parts. The program has "official releases", but development also follows the principles of continuous integration for what is the "stable" version of the program, i.e. new features such as bug fixes and small improvements are merged into the code as often as necessary, and tests are run systematically on the program to make sure that all capabilities remain operational and that the output does not change unexpectedly. In this document, user represents any user of the program, while developer represents an internal developer. Only developers have access to the private repositories. However, any user can make changes to the code and contribute to the program using only the public repository and would become a contributor.
The program has no more that three spaces:
-
The public website (Neper/FEPX) is a standard "showcase" website and presents the program itself, its applications, and provides links to the latest official release, documentation and other resources. It provides all is needed to use the program.
-
The public GitHub repository (
github
, Neper/FEPX) is home to the source code tree, which includes the official releases and the continuous integration versions, and is also an interactive space. It is for users who would like to have access to the latest version of the code or to get in touch with the developers and other users:-
The code is available in the (home) Code page and includes the official releases and continuous integration versions in a unique, linear branch,
main
. Users can get the code either by cloning the repository, or by downloading an official release or the latest version. -
Bug reports can be submitted in the Issues page (Neper/FEPX).
-
Question and comments can be submitted in the Discussions page (Neper/FEPX).
-
Code contributions can be submitted in the Pull requests page (Neper/FEPX).
More anecdotically, the website is contained in a (detached) branch,
gh-pages
, which GitHub seamlessly uses to build the website (available at https://username.github.io/project; https://neper.info and https://fepx.info redirect to such pages). -
-
The private GitHub repository (
github-dev
, Neper/FEPX) is the developers' workspace:-
The code is contained in the
main
branch (the same as on the public repository), adevel
branch (anddevel-?.?.?
branches) and possibly other, new-feature branches. This is detailed below. -
Interactions among developers take place as on the public repository, using the Issues, Discussions and Pull Requests pages.
-
In addition to standard Git, developers use two scripts:
-
neperfepx-git
, which replaces thegit
command. It runs Git with the provided arguments, updates the version number and helps to resolve merge conflicts. -
neperfepx-release
, which is used to create new releases.
Branches are used to handle different versions of the code (stable, development, etc.), which are on one or both repositories.
Branches and repositories of the program. Branches are shown in blue (archived branches in light blue), commits in black, merge commits in red, tags in green, and merges in red (note that add-feature
itself is not a good branch name...).
Different branches are used for the different levels of development. In principle, all developments are merged into main
on a new release.
-
The
main
branch is the "stable" branch and contains the official releases and continuous integration versions. It is the branch available on the public repository and is a simple, linear branch. It passes all tests. -
The
devel
branch is themainleading development branch. It passes all tests and is used by developers.- It is based on the commit corresponding to the last official release on
main
(this is done byneperfepx-release
). - It is kept up-to-date with
main
. - It can receive direct commits, be the base point of new-feature branches, and get merges directly or through pull requests.
- It merges into
main
(only usingneperfepx-release
).
- It is based on the commit corresponding to the last official release on
-
New-feature branches are created to implement new features (which usually require several commits). They should have explicit names, such as
improve-post-report
(starting by a verb at the imperative is a good practice).- They are based on the
devel
branch. - They are kept up-to-date with
devel
. - They generally receive direct commits.
- They merge into
devel
(as a standard merge or through a pull request).
- They are based on the
Keeping branches up-to-date with the branches they are based on is important. The rule of thumb is that, on every new commit in main
, main
is to be merged in devel
(this is the responsibility of who commits in main
), and, on every new commit in devel
, devel
is to be merged into the new-feature branches (this is the responsibility of who owns the new-feature branch). This is done as often as necessary to avoid hellish Git merges.
Of course, once updated, the branches (especially main
and devel
) are pushed to their associated repositories (both github
and github-dev
for main
, and github-dev
for devel
) to make them available to others.
When complete, the new-feature branches are merged into devel
. Before the merge, the new-feature branch should be up-to-date with devel
, as described right above. A new-feature branch can be merged in two ways:
- if the new-feature branch is on a local repository and is not associated to a pull request on a remote repository, using
git merge [--no-ff] branch_name
. - if the new-feature branch is on the development repository (
github-dev
) and associated to a pull request, usinggit mergepr remote_repository/branch_name
(wheremergepr
is specific toneperfepx-git
).
In both cases, the merge keeps track of all commits of the new-feature branch, unless the --squash
option is used.
The devel
branch is merged into main
only on new releases and using neperfepx-release
.
Versions numbers are defined in a standard way, as major.minor.patch
(see https://semver.org for a thorough discussion). Typically, patch versions (x.x.1
, x.x.2
, etc.) gather bug fixes and small improvements, minor versions (x.1.0
, x.2.0
, etc.) contain new features, and major versions (1.0.0
, 2.0.0
, etc.) are little revolutions, such as the addition of outstanding new features or global code overhaul. In the special circumstances where backward incompatibility is introduced, the new version should be either a minor or a major version. Using neperfepx-git
, a new version number is automatically created on each commit. When not associated to a release, a version number is formatted as major.minor.patch-releasecandidate
when in the main
branch, and major.minor.patch-branchname-releasecandidate
when in a development branch (either devel
or a new-feature branch), where patch
is the next patch number and releasecandidate
increments from 1 (whether the next release is a patch or minor or major release is generally not known in advance, and neperfepx-git
will always consider that it is a patch release - this is generally not problematic, as the new version number will be defined at release). For example, considering only main
, the versions immediately following 1.0.0
are 1.0.1-1
("release candidate for 1.0.1
"), 1.0.1-2
, etc. and will eventually be part of 1.0.1
(or 1.1.0
if the next release happens to be a minor release, or 2.0.0
for a major release). On an official release, the version number is prefixed v
to create a Git tag and GitHub release.
To start working as a developer of the program, you need to (i) have a GitHub account and (ii) be granted access to the private repository(ies). It is also a good idea to configure ssh access without a password.
First, you need to clone the code locally. To get the full code (and code history), you should clone the private repository:
$ git clone [email protected]:rquey/neper-dev.git neper # for Neper
$ git clone [email protected]:acmelab-ua/FEPX-dev.git fepx # for FEPX
This creates your own, local repository of the code (and code history) hosted on GitHub (but not the issues, etc.). You also want to have access to the public repository (to push, pull, etc.). A possibility would be to clone the public repository as you did for the public repository, but this would create another local repository, which is better to avoid (since there is only one of you). Actually, as you cloned the private repository, a remote was defined in your local repository, which is named origin
and points to the GitHub private repository (from which you cloned):
$ git remote show
origin
$ git remote show origin
* remote origin
Fetch URL: [email protected]:rquey/neper-dev.git # for Neper
Fetch URL: [email protected]:acmelab-ua/FEPX-dev.git # for FEPX
[...]
It is possible to define another remote in your local repository, corresponding to the public repository. To do so, you can
rename the first remote (origin
) to github-dev
and create a remote for the public repository, github
:
$ git remote rename origin github-dev
$ git remote add github [email protected]:rquey/neper.git # for Neper
$ git remote add github [email protected]:acmelab-ua/FEPX.git # for FEPX
From this point, it becomes possible for you to communicate with the public repository just as well as with the private repository. Since you cloned the private repository and its default branch is the devel
branch, you are currently on the devel
branch. Check out to the main
branch, and you will be able to pull both from github-dev
and github
:
$ git checkout main
$ git pull github-dev main
From github.com:rquey/neper-dev # for Neper
From github.com:acmelab-ua/FEPX-dev # for FEPX
* branch main -> FETCH_HEAD
Already up to date.
$ git pull github main
From github.com:rquey/neper # for Neper
From github.com:acmelab-ua/FEPX # for FEPX
* branch main -> FETCH_HEAD
* [new branch] main -> github/main
Already up to date.
(Depending on your system, you may get a warning: Pulling without specifying how to reconcile divergent branches...
. In that case, run git config pull.rebase false
(you will need to do this only once)).
If you have not done it before on your computer, now is a good time to tell Git who you are, as the information will be used by Git on new commits; you can also tell Git what your favorite editor is, as it will open on new commits:
$ git config --global user.name "John Doe"
$ git config --global user.email [email protected]
$ git config --global core.editor vim
The rule of thumb is that, on every commit, both the code and documentation should be kept up-to-date, and they should be consistent with each other, and so any changes to the code or new feature should be documented as they occur. This helps maintaining good documentation. Any commit should be done using neperfepx-git
. neperfepx-git
is a replacement of git
for developers, which runs Git with the provided arguments, updates the version number and helps resolving merge conflicts. It is a good idea to simply alias it as git
so that it is used by default (just add alias git=path/to/neperfepx-git
to your ~/.bashrc
file). In the following, it will be assumed that this has been done.
Commit messages are useful (to you now, as they help to structure development, to you in the future, and to others) and should not be neglected. Don't be too anxious about it, but good formatting is important as well. We follow Torvalds's directives and also this site. A good commit message looks like this:
Header line: explain the commit in one line (use the imperative)
Body of commit message is a few lines of text, explaining things
in more detail, possibly giving some background about the issue
being fixed, etc etc.
The body of the commit message can be several paragraphs, and
please do proper word-wrap and keep columns shorter than about
74 characters or so. That way "git log" will show things
nicely even when it's indented.
Make sure you explain your solution and why you're doing what you're
doing, as opposed to describing what you're doing. Reviewers and your
future self can read the patch, but might not understand why a
particular solution was implemented.
As said in the second reference, imperative mood just means "spoken or written as if giving a command or instruction", as in "Clean your room. Close the door. Take out the trash...". You will see that it is actually used by Git itself, e.g. on merges ("Merge ... into ...
"). Always starting by a verb (at the imperative) also proves to be a very good practice over time because you will find yourself often using the same verbs, such as "Fix", "Improve", "Update", etc., which will make the commit purpose obvious. No full stop (.
) at the end of the title line will allow you for one more character for actual text (as you are only allowed 50 characters for this, remember...).
If a commit is related to a GitHub issue or discussion, make a reference to it (via its number) in the commit message. You can even end the message with, e.g., Closes #2.
to get GitHub to automatically close the related issue (here, #2). However, Closes #2
certainly does not make a good commit title, as it says nothing about what the changes actually are (especially outside of the GitHub repository). Sometimes, it is useful to give the long issue number, which is formatted as author/project#issue
(for example rquey/neper#42
, rquey/neper-dev#46
, acmelab-ua/FEPX#23
, acmelab-ua/FEPX-dev#26
, etc.).
Bugs exist (still) and need to be fixed... and this is where continuous integration is important. Bug fixes (and small improvements) are simply published as new commits to main
, which therefore contains commits related to official releases and other, intermediary commits. Here is the workflow:
$ git checkout main # if needed
make changes to files...
$ git add .
$ git commit # do not forget to include "Closes #..." in the message, to close the issue
$ git push github main # make the commit available on github and close the issue
$ git push github-dev main # make the commit available on github-dev
The main
branch should be the same, at all time, on all repositories (public, private and local). As a new commit is pushed to main
, users and developers will have to run git pull github main
(or git pull github-dev main
, for developers, which work equally well) to update their own versions - this is their responsibility.
Of note, as main
is modified, the branches based on it should be updated, as described above.
New release are made at least every 2-3 months. This is done automatically, using neperfepx-release
.
On a new release, devel
is merged into main
(which, in simple terms, makes the code that was in devel
public). This is not done as a standard merge, however, but so that all developments appear as a single, "release" commit in main
(using Git merge's --squash
option). In this way, the main
branch is kept clean, while all "development" commits become archived in a branch named devel-?.?.?
(where "?.?.?
" is the new version number).
On a new release, a Git tag and a Git release are created, and the website is updated with links to the new release and documentation.
The source codes of the website (Neper/FEPX) is in the gh-pages
branch. The website sources can be updated at any time on this branch, and GitHub will seamlessly rebuild the website itself. Synchronization generally takes no more than 30 seconds. On a new release, neperfepx-release
updates the website automatically.
- Add the following code to your
~/.bashrc
to have the current branch printed before the prompt symbol ($
) in the terminal:
function parse_git_branch_and_add_brackets {
git branch --no-color 2> /dev/null | awk '{if ($1 == "*") print " ["$2"]"}'
}
function parse_and_cut_pwd {
pwd | grep Progs | awk -F/ '{print toupper($5)}' | cut -c1-1
}
PS1="\h:\W\[\033[0;33m\]\$(parse_git_branch_and_add_brackets) \[\033[0m\]\$ "