Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

!!! TASK: Remove NodeType::getName() and replace usages #4562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2023

Conversation

mhsdesign
Copy link
Member

Resolves: #4560

Upgrade instructions

Review instructions

Checklist

  • Code follows the PSR-2 coding style
  • Tests have been created, run and adjusted as needed
  • The PR is created against the lowest maintained branch
  • Reviewer - PR Title is brief but complete and starts with FEATURE|TASK|BUGFIX
  • Reviewer - The first section explains the change briefly for change-logs
  • Reviewer - Breaking Changes are marked with !!! and have upgrade-instructions

Copy link
Member

@kitsunet kitsunet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have a rector rule for node.nodeType.name because that would have to be adapted then? otherwise it could very much make sense to have one.

Copy link
Member

@bwaidelich bwaidelich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 by reading, and +1 for a rector migration :)

@mhsdesign mhsdesign linked an issue Sep 28, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@mhsdesign mhsdesign merged commit f02344c into nodeTypeFallbackHandling Sep 28, 2023
1 check passed
@mhsdesign mhsdesign deleted the task/removeNodeTypeGetName branch September 28, 2023 12:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

!!! Remove NodeType::getName
3 participants