Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Label db state metrics with 5.7 #1381

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

NataliaIvakina
Copy link
Contributor

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina commented Jan 26, 2024

As it was decided to tag all new additions with the corresponding labels in the 5.x series, we have to label database state metrics with Introduced in 5.7.
See PR #636

Copy link
Contributor

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, maybe just move the label to the title.

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina merged commit ae0cf07 into neo4j:dev Feb 1, 2024
7 checks passed
@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina deleted the dev-db-state-count-metrics branch February 1, 2024 13:09
NataliaIvakina added a commit to NataliaIvakina/docs-operations that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
As it was decided to tag all new additions with the corresponding labels
in the 5.x series, we have to label `database state metrics` with
`Introduced in 5.7`.
See PR neo4j#636
NataliaIvakina added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2024
As it was decided to tag all new additions with the corresponding labels
in the 5.x series, we have to label `database state metrics` with
`Introduced in 5.7`.
See PR #636
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants