Correct max label id #1176
Correct max label id #1176
Conversation
2^32 labels has never actually been supported, anything over 2^31 would fail with an integer overflow.
|
Thanks for the documentation updates. The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it. |
|
Corresponding code change https://github.com/neo-technology/neo4j/pull/23063 |
|
No problem. Can I leave merging and cherry-picking to you @renetapopova or should I do something more? |
I'll do it. |
|
@emmaholmbergohlsson, is this change applicable to 5.15 or to the current version? The docs are currently on 5.13. |
The real limit has always been 2^31, so it is applicable to current version as well. |
2^32 labels has never actually been supported, anything over 2^31 would fail with an integer overflow.
2^32 labels has never actually been supported, anything over 2^31 would fail with an integer overflow.
2^32 labels has never actually been supported, anything over 2^31 would fail with an integer overflow. Cherry-picked from #1176 Co-authored-by: emmaholmbergohlsson <[email protected]>
2^32 labels has never actually been supported, anything over 2^31 would fail with an integer overflow. Cherry-picked from #1176 Co-authored-by: emmaholmbergohlsson <[email protected]>
2^32 labels has never actually been supported,
anything over 2^31 would fail with an integer overflow.