Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

readonly structs #3676

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

readonly structs #3676

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

shargon
Copy link
Member

@shargon shargon commented Jan 16, 2025

Description

Use readonly for BigDecimal struct.

Type of change

  • Optimization (the change is only an optimization)
  • Style (the change is only a code style for better maintenance or standard purpose)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Not required

Test Configuration:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Copy link
Member

@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

glad to see you using var now! 😃

@shargon shargon merged commit 39e4fe1 into master Jan 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@shargon shargon deleted the readonly-bigdecimal branch January 17, 2025 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants