-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update 1 NuGet dependencies #282
Update 1 NuGet dependencies #282
Conversation
Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42</br> [version update] ###⚠️ This is an automated update.⚠️
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@nfbot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 27 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)Tests/NFUnitTestWifiConnection/packages.lock.json (2)
The TestFramework update coexists with other nanoFramework dependencies. Let's ensure there are no compatibility issues. ✅ Verification successfulNo compatibility issues found with TestFramework 3.0.42 After examining both packages.lock.json files and the project file, all dependencies are using exact version constraints and are properly resolved. The TestFramework 3.0.42 is being used alongside compatible versions of other nanoFramework packages:
All dependencies are properly locked and resolved in both the test project and the main System.Device.Wifi project. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify dependency compatibility
# Check if other dependencies have recommended versions for TestFramework 3.0.42
echo "Checking dependency compatibility..."
gh api repos/nanoframework/nanoframework.TestFramework/contents/README.md --jq .content | base64 -d | grep -A 5 "Compatible"
# Look for any compatibility matrices in docs
fd -g "*compatibility*.md" -g "*requirements*.md"
Length of output: 431 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the package dependencies in the lock file and related files
# First, let's see all nanoFramework dependencies in the lock file
echo "Checking all nanoFramework dependencies in packages.lock.json:"
rg -A 2 '"nanoFramework\.' packages.lock.json
# Check for any version constraints in project files
echo -e "\nChecking project file dependencies:"
fd -e csproj -x cat {}
Length of output: 355 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the correct path to the packages.lock.json and project files
# First, let's locate the packages.lock.json file
echo "Locating packages.lock.json files:"
fd -g "packages.lock.json"
# Then locate all project files
echo -e "\nLocating .csproj files:"
fd -g "*.csproj"
# Let's also check the directory structure to understand the context
echo -e "\nDirectory structure:"
ls -R Tests/NFUnitTestWifiConnection/
Length of output: 712 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's examine both packages.lock.json files and the project file to check compatibility
echo "Checking Test project's packages.lock.json:"
cat Tests/NFUnitTestWifiConnection/packages.lock.json
echo -e "\nChecking main project's packages.lock.json:"
cat System.Device.Wifi/packages.lock.json
echo -e "\nChecking project file:"
cat Tests/NFUnitTestWifiConnection/NFUnitTestWifiConnection.nfproj
Length of output: 9222
The update from TestFramework 2.1.113 to 3.0.42 represents a major version bump, which typically indicates breaking changes in the API. Let's verify the changelog and any breaking changes: ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the test files to see if they use any potentially affected APIs. Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response: Major version upgrade (2.x → 3.x) appears safe to proceed The update from TestFramework 2.1.113 to 3.0.42 shows minimal impact:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the TestFramework upgrade
# Check for any test files that might need updates
echo "Searching for test files that might need updates..."
fd -e cs -e vb --type f . Tests/
# Fetch release notes or changelog
echo "Fetching changelog for breaking changes..."
gh api repos/nanoframework/nanoframework.TestFramework/releases/tags/v3.0.42 --jq .body
Length of output: 919 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for TestFramework usage patterns in test files
echo "Checking test files for TestFramework usage..."
rg -l "using nanoFramework.TestFramework" Tests/
echo "\nChecking specific test attributes and assertions..."
rg -A 2 "\[Test.*\]|\[Setup\]|\[TearDown\]|Assert\." Tests/
Length of output: 9862 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Bumps nanoFramework.TestFramework from 2.1.113 to 3.0.42
[version update]
Summary by CodeRabbit
nanoFramework.TestFramework
dependency to version3.0.42
for improved functionality and performance in testing.