Semantic versions published out of chronological order.

This could either indicate dependency confusion or a patched vulnerability.

Uses debug, reflection and dynamic code execution features.

Removing the use of debug will reduce the risk of any reflection and dynamic code execution.

Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution.

Packages should avoid dynamic imports when possible. Audit the use of dynamic require to ensure it is not executing malicious or vulnerable code.

Package accesses environment variables, which may be a sign of credential stuffing or data theft.

Packages should be clear about which environment variables they access, and care should be taken to ensure they only access environment variables they claim to.

Package does not contain any code. It may be removed, is name squatting, or the result of a faulty package publish.

Remove dependencies that do not export any code or functionality and ensure the package version includes all of the files it is supposed to.

Package has recently undergone a major refactor. It may be unstable or indicate significant internal changes. Use caution when updating to versions that include significant changes.

Consider waiting before upgrading to see if any issues are discovered, or be prepared to scrutinize any bugs or subtle changes the major refactor may bring. Publishers my consider publishing beta versions of major refactors to limit disruption to parties interested in the new changes.

Package is not semver >=1. This means it is not stable and does not support ^ ranges.

If the package sees any general use, it should begin releasing at version 1.0.0 or later to benefit from semver.

This module accesses the network.

Packages should remove all network access that is functionally unnecessary. Consumers should audit network access to ensure legitimate use.

Accesses the file system, and could potentially read sensitive data.

If a package must read the file system, clarify what it will read and ensure it reads only what it claims to. If appropriate, packages can leave file system access to consumers and operate on data passed to it instead.

A new npm collaborator published a version of the package for the first time. New collaborators are usually benign additions to a project, but do indicate a change to the security surface area of a package.

Scrutinize new collaborator additions to packages because they now have the ability to publish code into your dependency tree. Packages should avoid frequent or unnecessary additions or changes to publishing rights.

Package semver skipped several versions, this could indicate a dependency confusion attack or indicate the intention of disruptive breaking changes or major priority shifts for the project.

Packages should follow semantic versions conventions by not skipping subsequent version numbers. Consumers should research the purpose of the skipped version number.

(Experimental) Package contains multiple licenses.

A new version of the package should be published that includes a single license. Consumers may seek clarification from the package author. Ensure that the license details are consistent across the LICENSE file, package.json license field and license details mentioned in the README.

Package has not been updated in more than a year and may be unmaintained. Problems with the package may go unaddressed.

Package should publish periodic maintenance releases if they are maintained, or deprecate if they have no intention in further maintenance.

This module accesses the system shell. Accessing the system shell increases the risk of executing arbitrary code.

Packages should avoid accessing the shell which can reduce portability, and make it easier for malicious shell access to be introduced.

Package version was not found on the registry. It may exist on a different registry and need to be configured to pull from that registry.

Packages can be removed from the registry by manually un-publishing, a security issue removal, or may simply never have been published to the registry. Reliance on these packages will cause problem when they are not found.

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected] bar@* or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

• @SocketSecurity ignore @pkgjs/[email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore @puppeteer/[email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore @jest/[email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore @sinonjs/[email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore @sinonjs/[email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]
• @SocketSecurity ignore [email protected]