Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #13]Optimize impl From<&'static str> for CheetahString #14

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 7, 2024

close #13

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced flexibility of the CheetahString by allowing it to accept a broader range of string slice inputs.
    • Introduced a new method from_slice for creating CheetahString from string slices.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the implementation of the From trait for string slices, ensuring better compatibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CheetahString struct in src/cheetah_string.rs, specifically updating the From trait implementation to accept a more generic string slice type, &'a str, instead of just &'static str. A new method, from_slice, is introduced to create a CheetahString from a string slice using Arc<String>. The overall structure and existing functionalities of CheetahString remain unchanged, ensuring compatibility with various string representations.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/cheetah_string.rs Updated From trait implementation from &'static str to &'a str. Added from_slice method for creating CheetahString from string slices.

Poem

In the land of strings, a change took flight,
Cheetah's heart now beats more bright.
From static to flexible, a leap so grand,
With from_slice now at our command.
Hop along, dear friends, let’s cheer and play,
For CheetahString shines a new way! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/cheetah_string.rs (1)

30-32: LGTM! Consider documenting performance implications.

The change from From<&'static str> to From<&'a str> improves flexibility by accepting string slices with any lifetime. However, this means we'll always allocate a new Arc<String> instead of potentially reusing static strings.

Consider adding documentation to clarify:

  1. The performance implications of this implementation
  2. The difference between this and the from_slice method, as they currently do the same thing
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eea5b5 and d9da3af.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/cheetah_string.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/cheetah_string.rs (1)

30-32: Verify performance impact of removing static string optimization.

The changes remove the ability to store static strings without allocation. Let's verify the impact on the codebase.

Also applies to: 103-108

✅ Verification successful

Performance impact of removing static string optimization is minimal

Based on the codebase analysis:

  • The only direct usage of static string optimization is in benchmarks (benches/cheetah.rs)
  • No performance-critical paths or const/static declarations using CheetahString were found
  • The main usages are in serde implementations and type conversions, which are not performance-sensitive paths

The removal of static string optimization doesn't significantly impact the codebase as:

  1. Most usages are dynamic string conversions through from_string, from_slice, and from_bytes
  2. The static string optimization was primarily used in benchmarking code, not production paths
  3. No const or static CheetahString declarations were found that would benefit from the optimization
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential performance impact points

# Test 1: Look for direct string literal usage that could benefit from static optimization
echo "Searching for string literal assignments that might benefit from static optimization..."
rg --type rust "CheetahString::from\(\".*\"\)" -A 2

# Test 2: Look for existing performance-critical code that might be affected
echo "Checking for performance-critical code paths..."
rg --type rust "(#\[bench\]|#\[test\]|performance|benchmark).*CheetahString" -A 5

Length of output: 425


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to analyze the impact

# Check for all usages of CheetahString::from and CheetahString::from_str
echo "Checking all CheetahString::from and from_str usages..."
rg --type rust "CheetahString::(from|from_str)" -B 2 -A 2

# Look for any tests or benchmarks related to CheetahString
echo "Checking for tests and benchmarks..."
rg --type rust "mod\s+tests.*CheetahString|#\[test\].*CheetahString" -B 2 -A 5

# Check for any const or static declarations using CheetahString
echo "Checking for const/static usage..."
rg --type rust "(const|static).*CheetahString" -B 1 -A 2

# Look at the implementation details of CheetahString
echo "Checking CheetahString implementation..."
rg --type rust "impl.*CheetahString" -B 1 -A 5

Length of output: 7708

src/cheetah_string.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Optimize impl From<&'static str> for CheetahString
2 participants