Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[stdlib] Add
List[Scalar[D]]
appendSIMD
andSpan[Scalar[D]]
#3854[stdlib] Add
List[Scalar[D]]
appendSIMD
andSpan[Scalar[D]]
#3854Changes from 2 commits
1f05a6b
ac0d252
922a18e
b0b2da9
70865d8
7cfe7e0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! This is a great cleanup 🙂
In theory this might be slightly less efficient since the
append()
will need to perform redundant bounds-checking. But I think that's a small cost that we shouldn't worry too much about optimizing yet.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could add a
unsafe_no_checks
parameter to all the append functions at some point. That way we'd stop having to resort toUnsafePointer
so much for such scenarios.