refactor(http): optimize request authorization and validation #532
Conversation
- Remove redundant authorize() methods from request classes - Add NoAuthorizeTrait for consistent authorization logic - Implement HttpMethodTrait for HTTP method checks - Update RoleRequest with custom validation rules for code - Add token retrieval failure check in GetTokenTrait - Remove unnecessary comments and adjust imports
📝 Walkthrough概述演练这个拉取请求包含了多个文件的变更，主要涉及请求授权逻辑的重构和一些trait的引入。在多个请求类中， 变更
可能相关的PR
建议标签
建议审阅者
诗歌
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
tests/HttpTestCase.php (1)
Line range hint
19-27: 建议改进类的结构设计当前使用
@method注解和魔术方法__call来实现 HTTP 测试方法。建议考虑以下改进：
- 显式声明这些方法以获得更好的 IDE 支持和类型安全
- 使用接口来定义标准的 HTTP 测试方法
示例改进：
interface HttpTestInterface { public function get(string $uri, array $data = [], array $headers = []): mixed; public function post(string $uri, array $data = [], array $headers = []): mixed; // ... 其他方法 } abstract class HttpTestCase extends TestCase implements HttpTestInterface { // 实现接口方法 }app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/RoleRequest.php (1)
15-16: 建议将命名空间Trait更改为Traits以遵循惯例为了遵循 PSR-4 和命名惯例，建议将命名空间
App\Http\Common\Request\Trait更改为App\Http\Common\Request\Traits，使代码结构更清晰。app/Http/Common/Request/Trait/HttpMethodTrait.php (1)
20-41: 代码实现清晰且符合 RESTful 规范特点：
- 方法命名直观且符合语义
- 正确处理了 PUT/PATCH 的等价性
- 使用了类型提示和严格类型检查
建议：考虑添加方法级别的 PHPDoc 注释以提供更详细的使用说明。
trait HttpMethodTrait { + /** + * 检查是否为创建请求 + */ public function isCreate(): bool { return $this->isMethod('POST'); } + /** + * 检查是否为更新请求 + */ public function isUpdate(): bool { return $this->isMethod('PUT') || $this->isMethod('PATCH'); } + /** + * 检查是否为删除请求 + */ public function isDelete(): bool { return $this->isMethod('DELETE'); } + /** + * 检查是否为查询请求 + */ public function isSearch(): bool { return $this->isMethod('GET'); }app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/UserRequest.php (1)
Line range hint
54-65: 建议增强验证规则的安全性当前的验证规则可以进一步加强：
- 建议为
phone添加格式验证- 建议为
- 考虑为
avatar添加 URL 格式验证建议修改验证规则如下：
public function rules(): array { return [ 'username' => 'required|string|max:20', 'user_type' => 'required|integer', 'nickname' => ['required', 'string', 'max:60', 'regex:/^[^\s]+$/'], - 'phone' => 'sometimes|string|max:12', - 'email' => 'sometimes|string|max:60', - 'avatar' => 'sometimes|string|max:255', + 'phone' => 'sometimes|string|max:12|regex:/^[0-9-+()]+$/', + 'email' => 'sometimes|string|max:60|email:rfc,dns', + 'avatar' => 'sometimes|string|max:255|url', 'signed' => 'sometimes|string|max:255', 'status' => 'sometimes|integer', 'backend_setting' => 'sometimes|array|max:255', 'remark' => 'sometimes|string|max:255', ]; }tests/Feature/Admin/Permission/RoleControllerTest.php (1)
71-82: 测试用例增强合理，建议补充边界场景！测试用例正确验证了重复角色代码的处理，但建议增加以下测试场景：
- 特殊字符在角色代码中的处理
- 角色代码长度限制的验证
- 空白字符的处理
建议添加如下测试用例：
public function testCreate(): void { // ... existing code ... + + // 测试特殊字符 + $fill['code'] = 'test@#$%'; + $result = $this->post('/admin/role', $fill, ['Authorization' => 'Bearer ' . $token]); + self::assertSame($result['code'], ResultCode::UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY->value); + + // 测试超长代码 + $fill['code'] = Str::random(256); + $result = $this->post('/admin/role', $fill, ['Authorization' => 'Bearer ' . $token]); + self::assertSame($result['code'], ResultCode::UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY->value); + + // 测试空白字符 + $fill['code'] = " test "; + $result = $this->post('/admin/role', $fill, ['Authorization' => 'Bearer ' . $token]); + self::assertSame($result['code'], ResultCode::UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY->value); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
app/Http/Admin/Request/PassportLoginRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantPermissionsForRoleRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantRolesForUserRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/MenuRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/PermissionRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/RoleRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/UserRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/UploadRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Api/Request/V1/UserRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Common/Request/Trait/HttpMethodTrait.php(1 hunks)app/Http/Common/Request/Trait/NoAuthorizeTrait.php(1 hunks)app/Model/Permission/Role.php(2 hunks)app/Model/Permission/User.php(0 hunks)tests/Feature/Admin/GetTokenTrait.php(1 hunks)tests/Feature/Admin/Permission/RoleControllerTest.php(1 hunks)tests/HttpTestCase.php(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- app/Model/Permission/User.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: build Code coverage report (ubuntu-latest, 8.1, v5.1.3)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build Code coverage report (ubuntu-latest, 8.1, v5.1.3)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
tests/HttpTestCase.php (2)
42-42: 构造函数参数传递不一致构造函数声明了三个参数（
$name、$data、$dataName），但只向父类构造函数传递了$name参数。这种不一致可能会导致测试数据初始化问题。让我们验证 PHPUnit TestCase 的构造函数要求：
Line range hint
31-31: 协程测试注意事项使用
RunTestsInCoroutine特性运行测试时，请注意以下几点：
- 确保在测试结束时正确清理资源
- 注意协程间的数据隔离
- 防止协程泄漏
建议添加协程资源清理的测试辅助方法：
protected function tearDown(): void { // 清理协程资源 parent::tearDown(); }✅ Verification successful
协程测试基类需要增强资源管理机制
原始评审意见中提出的问题是合理的。当前的
HttpTestCase类虽然使用了RunTestsInCoroutine特性来支持协程测试，但缺少必要的资源清理机制。建议按照原评审意见所述，实现tearDown方法来确保协程资源的正确释放。需要注意的关键点：
- 当前实现中没有显式的资源清理逻辑
- 在协程环境中运行测试可能导致资源泄漏
- 建议实现
tearDown方法以确保测试案例间的隔离性🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for RunTestsInCoroutine trait usage echo "=== Searching for RunTestsInCoroutine trait usage ===" rg "use.*RunTestsInCoroutine" -l echo -e "\n=== Checking for tearDown implementations ===" ast-grep --pattern 'function tearDown()' echo -e "\n=== Looking for coroutine cleanup patterns ===" rg "清理协程|cleanup.*coroutine|destroy.*coroutine" -A 2Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash echo "=== Examining HttpTestCase.php implementation ===" cat tests/HttpTestCase.php echo -e "\n=== Looking for parent TestCase class ===" fd -t f "TestCase.php" --exec cat {}Length of output: 2925
app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/RoleRequest.php (3)
28-29: 良好的代码重用：使用 Trait 简化授权和方法判断通过使用
HttpMethodTrait和NoAuthorizeTrait，避免了重复代码，提高了代码的可维护性和可读性。
35-40: 强化了code字段的验证规则，增强数据完整性新增的验证规则确保
code字段为必填项，长度不超过 60 个字符，只能包含字母、数字和下划线，提升了数据的完整性和安全性。
45-50: 根据操作类型添加唯一性验证，逻辑正确动态地根据创建或更新操作添加
code字段的唯一性验证规则，确保了数据库中的code字段唯一性，逻辑清晰准确。app/Http/Common/Request/Trait/NoAuthorizeTrait.php (1)
1-21: 引入NoAuthorizeTrait实现代码重用将
authorize方法封装在NoAuthorizeTrait中，有效减少了各请求类中重复的授权代码，提高了代码的可维护性。app/Http/Admin/Request/UploadRequest.php (1)
15-15: 使用NoAuthorizeTrait简化授权逻辑通过引入
NoAuthorizeTrait，移除了冗余的authorize方法，实现了代码重用和简化。Also applies to: 28-28
app/Http/Api/Request/V1/UserRequest.php (1)
Line range hint
15-27: 授权逻辑重构合理通过引入
NoAuthorizeTrait替代原有的authorize()方法，使授权逻辑更加统一和可维护。建议：验证一下移除
authorize()方法后是否会影响现有的权限检查逻辑。✅ Verification successful
授权方法移除验证完成
经过验证，移除
authorize()方法是安全的：
- 代码中使用
NoAuthorizeTrait是统一的授权处理方案- 实际的权限控制通过
#[Permission]注解实现- 未发现对原
authorize()方法的直接依赖🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # 检查是否有其他地方依赖 UserRequest 的 authorize 方法 rg -l "UserRequest.*authorize"Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any UserRequest usage rg "UserRequest" -A 3 # Check NoAuthorizeTrait implementation ast-grep --pattern 'trait NoAuthorizeTrait { $$$ }'Length of output: 4956
app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantRolesForUserRequest.php (1)
Line range hint
15-28: 授权逻辑统一化处理使用
NoAuthorizeTrait替换独立的authorize()方法，保持了代码的一致性。注意：
role_codes的验证规则使用了数据库检查，建议确认性能影响。app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantPermissionsForRoleRequest.php (1)
Line range hint
15-28: 权限验证逻辑需要审查使用
NoAuthorizeTrait的改动符合重构方向，但有以下几点需要注意：
permissions字段使用了sometimes修饰符，需要确认是否允许空提交- 权限验证使用
menu.name作为存在性检查，需要确保这是正确的设计✅ Verification successful
权限验证设计符合系统要求
经过验证，当前实现有以下特点：
- 使用
menu.name作为权限标识符是系统设计的一部分，与权限中间件实现一致sometimes修饰符的使用允许批量授权时的灵活操作，符合业务需求🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # 检查 menu 表结构以确认 name 字段的设计 rg -l "CREATE.*TABLE.*menu.*name" # 检查是否有其他地方也使用 menu.name 作为权限标识 rg "exists:menu,name"Length of output: 189
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for menu and permission related migrations fd -e php migration -x rg -l "Schema::create\('(menu|permissions?|roles?)" {} # Search for permission-related models fd -e php "Permission|Role|Menu" -x cat {} # Find other permission validation patterns rg -A 3 "permission.*=>.*'(required|sometimes|exists)"Length of output: 65834
tests/Feature/Admin/GetTokenTrait.php (1)
40-42: 增强了令牌获取的错误处理添加了对返回结果类型的验证，这样可以更早地捕获并处理错误情况，提高了代码的健壮性。
app/Http/Admin/Request/PassportLoginRequest.php (1)
15-15: 优化了授权逻辑的处理方式通过引入
NoAuthorizeTrait统一了授权逻辑的处理，减少了代码重复，提高了可维护性。执行以下脚本以验证 trait 的使用情况：
Also applies to: 31-31
✅ Verification successful
特征（Trait）使用验证通过
验证显示
NoAuthorizeTrait已在多个请求类中得到广泛应用，包括权限管理、用户管理等核心功能模块。此次在PassportLoginRequest中的使用符合项目的最佳实践。🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # 描述：验证 NoAuthorizeTrait 的实现和使用 # 预期：找到 trait 的定义和所有使用该 trait 的类 # 检查 trait 的定义 rg -l "trait NoAuthorizeTrait" # 检查使用该 trait 的类 rg -l "use NoAuthorizeTrait;"Length of output: 592
app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/PermissionRequest.php (1)
15-15: 统一了权限请求的授权处理采用
NoAuthorizeTrait简化了授权逻辑，与系统其他请求处理保持一致，同时保留了完整的验证规则。Also applies to: 27-27
app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/UserRequest.php (1)
15-15: 统一了用户请求的授权处理使用
NoAuthorizeTrait优化了授权逻辑，使代码结构更加清晰。Also applies to: 50-50
app/Model/Permission/Role.php (1)
18-18: 导入声明看起来没有问题！正确导入了
Deleting事件类，用于处理删除事件。app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/MenuRequest.php (2)
15-15: 导入 NoAuthorizeTrait 符合重构目标！正确引入了 NoAuthorizeTrait，符合 PR 中统一授权处理的重构目标。
28-28: 特征使用正确，建议验证授权行为！正确使用了 NoAuthorizeTrait 替代原有的 authorize 方法。建议验证新的授权机制是否在所有场景下都能正常工作。
✅ Verification successful
NoAuthorizeTrait 实现验证完成，使用正确！
该特征在
app/Http/Common/Request/Trait/NoAuthorizeTrait.php中实现，并在所有请求类中保持一致使用。验证显示：
- 特征实现简单明确，符合设计意图
- 在 Admin 和 API 模块中统一使用，保持了代码一致性
- 没有发现重复或冲突的授权实现
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # 验证 NoAuthorizeTrait 的一致性使用 # 检查所有请求类中的授权实现 ast-grep --pattern 'class $_$Request extends FormRequest { $$$ public function authorize() { $$$ } $$$ }' # 检查 NoAuthorizeTrait 的使用情况 rg "use NoAuthorizeTrait" --type phpLength of output: 869
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check NoAuthorizeTrait implementation ast-grep --pattern 'trait NoAuthorizeTrait { $$$ }' # Look for related authorization interfaces/classes rg "interface.*Authorization|abstract.*Authorization" --type phpLength of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find trait file fd NoAuthorizeTrait.php # Search for trait definition with more flexible pattern rg "trait NoAuthorizeTrait" --type php -A 5 # Look for files that might contain the trait rg "class.*Trait|trait.*\{" --type phpLength of output: 639
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:L
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #532 +/- ##
=============================
=============================
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
- Add deleting event handler in Menu model to detach associated roles - Update Role model to also detach associated menus when deleting
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/Model/Permission/Menu.php (2)
93-96: 菜单删除时清理关联角色关系在删除菜单时，通过
deleting事件处理器自动解除与角色的关联关系，这样可以：
- 防止产生孤立的关联数据记录
- 确保数据一致性
- 遵循了最佳实践
建议添加以下改进：
public function deleting(Deleting $event) { $this->roles()->detach(); + // 同时递归删除所有子菜单 + $this->children()->delete(); }
92-92: 注意代码格式删除多余的空行以保持代码整洁。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
app/Model/Permission/Menu.php(2 hunks)app/Model/Permission/Role.php(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/Model/Permission/Role.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (16)
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: build Code coverage report (ubuntu-latest, 8.1, v5.1.3)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build Code coverage report (ubuntu-latest, 8.1, v5.1.3)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/Model/Permission/Menu.php (1)
19-19: 导入 Deleting 事件类引入 Deleting 事件类用于处理模型删除事件，符合框架规范。
… from "./tests/coverage/index.xml" to "./tests/coverage.xml/index.xml"
- Move NoAuthorizeTrait and HttpMethodTrait to Traits directory - Update namespace from Trait to Traits in multiple files - Adjust import statements in various request files to use new namespace
- Update Codecov workflow to use new file path - Remove CodeQL workflow as it's no longer needed
- Update .gitignore to include tests/coverage directory - Modify GitHub Actions workflow to use correct coverage file path - Remove regex validation for phone number in UserRequest
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
app/Http/Admin/Request/UploadRequest.php (1)
Line range hint
28-37: 建议加强文件上传的验证规则当前的文件验证规则过于简单，建议增加以下限制：
- 文件大小限制
- 允许的文件类型限制
- 文件名验证
- MIME类型验证
public function rules(): array { return [ - 'file' => 'required|file', + 'file' => [ + 'required', + 'file', + 'max:10240', // 10MB + 'mimes:jpeg,png,jpg,gif,doc,docx,xls,xlsx,pdf', + 'mimetypes:image/*,application/pdf,application/msword,application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,application/vnd.ms-excel,application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet' + ], ]; }
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml (1)
87-87: 建议在文件末尾添加换行符根据 YAML 文件的最佳实践，文件应该以换行符结尾。
file: "tests/coverage/index.xml" +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 87-87: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
app/Http/Common/Request/Traits/HttpMethodTrait.php (2)
17-19: 建议增加方法级别的文档注释
@mixin注解很好，但建议为每个方法添加 PHPDoc 注释，包含：
- 方法的用途
- 返回值的含义
- 使用示例
22-40: 代码结构清晰，建议小幅优化代码实现简洁明了，建议考虑以下优化：
- 可以将HTTP方法名称定义为类常量，避免魔术字符串
- 考虑添加一个通用的
isMethod(string $method): bool公共方法trait HttpMethodTrait { + private const METHOD_POST = 'POST'; + private const METHOD_PUT = 'PUT'; + private const METHOD_PATCH = 'PATCH'; + private const METHOD_DELETE = 'DELETE'; + private const METHOD_GET = 'GET'; + public function isCreate(): bool { - return $this->isMethod('POST'); + return $this->isMethod(self::METHOD_POST); }app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/RoleRequest.php (2)
35-40: 建议优化角色代码的验证规则当前的代码验证规则可以进一步改进：
- 正则表达式应该更严格，建议限制首字符为字母
- 建议添加最小长度限制
- 建议在类中定义正则表达式为常量
+ private const CODE_PATTERN = '/^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_]{2,59}$/'; + public function rules(): array { $rules = [ 'name' => 'required|string|max:60', 'code' => [ 'required', 'string', + 'min:3', 'max:60', - 'regex:/^[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$/', + 'regex:' . self::CODE_PATTERN, ],
45-50: 建议添加自定义验证消息对于复杂的验证规则，建议添加自定义错误消息，以提供更好的用户体验。
public function rules(): array { // ... existing rules ... return $rules; } + + public function messages(): array + { + return [ + 'code.regex' => trans('role.code_format_invalid'), + 'code.unique' => trans('role.code_already_exists'), + ]; + }app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/UserRequest.php (1)
59-60: 建议优化邮箱验证规则以提高性能当前的邮箱验证规则
email:rfc,dns包含了 DNS 检查，这可能会导致：
- 验证过程变慢
- 外部 DNS 服务器不可用时验证失败
- 增加系统对外部服务的依赖
建议考虑是否真的需要 DNS 检查，如果不是强需求，可以简化为：
- 'email' => 'sometimes|string|max:60|email:rfc,dns', + 'email' => 'sometimes|string|max:60|email:rfc',URL 验证规则的更新很好，可以确保头像地址的有效性。
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/codeql.yml(0 hunks).gitignore(1 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/PassportLoginRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantPermissionsForRoleRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantRolesForUserRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/MenuRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/PermissionRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/RoleRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/UserRequest.php(3 hunks)app/Http/Admin/Request/UploadRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Api/Request/V1/UserRequest.php(2 hunks)app/Http/Common/Request/Traits/HttpMethodTrait.php(1 hunks)app/Http/Common/Request/Traits/NoAuthorizeTrait.php(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/codeql.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- app/Http/Api/Request/V1/UserRequest.php
- app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/PermissionRequest.php
- app/Http/Admin/Request/PassportLoginRequest.php
- app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantRolesForUserRequest.php
- app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/MenuRequest.php
- app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/BatchGrantPermissionsForRoleRequest.php
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml
[error] 87-87: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (20)
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swoole-v5.0.3
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swoole-master
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.1 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swoole-v5.1.5
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.2 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: Test on PHP8.3 Swow-develop
- GitHub Check: build Code coverage report (ubuntu-latest, 8.1, v5.1.3)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build Code coverage report (ubuntu-latest, 8.1, v5.1.3)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/code-coverage.yml (1)
87-87: 代码覆盖率报告路径修改正确！移除路径中的 "./" 前缀不会影响功能，因为这两种路径表示方式是等效的。
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 87-87: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
app/Http/Common/Request/Traits/NoAuthorizeTrait.php (1)
15-21: 需要仔细考虑授权策略的安全性这个特征总是返回
true，可能会绕过重要的授权检查。建议：
- 添加类级别的文档注释，说明此特征的使用场景
- 考虑添加警告注释，提醒开发者谨慎使用
✅ Verification successful
特征使用符合预期，无需修改
经过分析，
NoAuthorizeTrait的使用是合理的：
- 仅用于管理后台和API的请求验证类
- 主要应用于权限管理和认证相关的请求
- 符合Laravel中表单请求的常见实践
这些请求类通常已经受到路由中间件的保护，跳过表单请求级别的授权检查是可接受的。
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # 检查使用此特征的类，确保它们确实不需要授权检查 rg -l "use.*NoAuthorizeTrait" | xargs rg "class.*Request"Length of output: 937
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check route definitions and middleware rg "Route::(get|post|put|delete|patch).*Permission|User|Role|Menu|Upload" routes/Length of output: 131
app/Http/Admin/Request/Permission/UserRequest.php (2)
15-15: 导入更改符合重构目标！引入
NoAuthorizeTrait符合重构的目标，使授权逻辑更加集中和统一。
50-50: 特征（Trait）使用恰当！使用
NoAuthorizeTrait替代原有的authorize()方法是个很好的重构决定，使代码更加简洁和可维护。
Summary by CodeRabbit
新特性
HttpMethodTrait和NoAuthorizeTrait特征，简化请求授权和方法检测Bug 修复
测试
代码重构
文档
.gitignore文件，忽略测试覆盖率目录