Set exiftool path explicitly. #267
Merged
+55
−16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gagb
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2025
keenranger
reviewed
Jan 9, 2025
Comment on lines
-344
to
-348
| test_markitdown_remote() | ||
| test_markitdown_local() | ||
| # test_markitdown_remote() | ||
| # test_markitdown_local() | ||
| test_markitdown_exiftool() | ||
| test_markitdown_deprecation() | ||
| test_markitdown_llm() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi, I noticed that the tests in test_markitdown_exiftool() were commented out in this commit. Was this an intentional change, or was it possibly included by mistake?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR disables the automatic detection of exiftool, instead requiring it to be set explicitly either via the
exiftool_pathparameter in the MarkItDown constructor or by reading from the 'EXIFTOOL_PATH' environment variable.