Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[microsoft/release-branch.go1.21] Port symbol publish and changes necessary to publish to PME #1244

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

dagood
Copy link
Member

@dagood dagood commented Jun 7, 2024

Test build: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng/internal/_build/results?buildId=2468905&view=results

Related: 1.22 ports: #1245

dagood and others added 4 commits June 6, 2024 17:23
Generate symbols for all Go toolchain binaries

(cherry picked from commit
ee78796 with
conflict resolution due to not using distpack)
"az" doesn't contain a tool that seems to support
non-SAS-token-based auth. It will authenticate
broadly using the service connection, but actual
storage copies are performed by grabbing the
access key. So, use AzureFileCopy@6, which
explicitly supports what we need to do. This task
only runs on Windows, so switch the publish stages
over from Linux.

Add "publishExistingRunID" parameter for test
runs. This has been done previously as a
hard-coded temporary change, but publish is
complex enough now to warrant a more usable and
permanent debug feature.

(cherry picked from commit 7262f0e)
(cherry picked from commit 3242a72)

update stage0 checksums

(cherry picked from commit 694f922)
@dagood dagood force-pushed the dev/dagood/port-pme-1.21 branch from 4583651 to d4c1c2f Compare June 7, 2024 16:44
@dagood dagood marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2024 17:51
@dagood dagood requested a review from a team as a code owner June 7, 2024 17:51
@karianna karianna merged commit 33cd90f into microsoft/release-branch.go1.21 Jun 10, 2024
20 checks passed
@dagood dagood deleted the dev/dagood/port-pme-1.21 branch September 9, 2024 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants