Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade base to open enclave 0.19.7 #6293

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

achamayou
Copy link
Member

@achamayou achamayou commented Jun 26, 2024

Pick up latest version of Open Enclave.

@achamayou achamayou requested a review from a team June 26, 2024 10:30
@achamayou achamayou added auto-backport Automatically backport this PR to LTS branch 4.x-todo PRs which should be backported to 4.x labels Jun 26, 2024
@achamayou achamayou merged commit 5687a4b into main Jun 26, 2024
44 checks passed
@achamayou achamayou deleted the upgrade_base_to_open_enclave_0.19.7 branch June 26, 2024 15:52
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 26, 2024

💔 All backports failed

Status Branch Result
release/4.x Backport failed because of merge conflicts

Manual backport

To create the backport manually run:

backport --pr 6293

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation and see the Github Action logs for details

achamayou added a commit to achamayou/CCF that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2024
(cherry picked from commit 5687a4b)

# Conflicts:
#	.azure-pipelines-model-checking.yml
#	.azure-pipelines-release.yml
#	.github/workflows/bencher.yml
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	cmake/open_enclave.cmake
@achamayou achamayou added the backported This PR was successfully backported to LTS branch label Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
4.x-todo PRs which should be backported to 4.x auto-backport Automatically backport this PR to LTS branch backported This PR was successfully backported to LTS branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants