Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TLA+ specification for client consistency #5699

Merged
merged 94 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

heidihoward
Copy link
Member

@heidihoward heidihoward commented Sep 29, 2023

This PR adds a new TLA+ specification for client consistency guarantees

Following on from the discussion in #5636

@achamayou
Copy link
Member

@heidihoward this potentially very interesting to users building applications and APIs, and so ought to be featured in the documentation in my opinion.

There is a TLA+ Specification under Architecture in the documentation (which probably needs a refresh, from having a quick glance at it). But I wonder if it wouldn't best to start a new top-level "Specifications", with "Consensus" and "Client Consistency" sub-entries.

What do you think?

@heidihoward heidihoward marked this pull request as ready for review October 11, 2023 14:20
@heidihoward heidihoward requested a review from a team October 11, 2023 14:20
@heidihoward
Copy link
Member Author

@heidihoward this potentially very interesting to users building applications and APIs, and so ought to be featured in the documentation in my opinion.

There is a TLA+ Specification under Architecture in the documentation (which probably needs a refresh, from having a quick glance at it). But I wonder if it wouldn't best to start a new top-level "Specifications", with "Consensus" and "Client Consistency" sub-entries.

What do you think?

Sounds good, will save it for another PR though to get this merged

@heidihoward heidihoward enabled auto-merge (squash) October 16, 2023 11:00
@heidihoward heidihoward merged commit 724c827 into microsoft:main Oct 16, 2023
@heidihoward heidihoward deleted the tla-clientobs branch October 16, 2023 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants