Skip to content

fix: fix optree compatibility

This check has been archived and is scheduled for deletion. Learn more about checks retention
Codecov / codecov/project succeeded Nov 8, 2023 in 1s

93.66% (+0.01%) compared to 86b167c

View this Pull Request on Codecov

93.66% (+0.01%) compared to 86b167c

Details

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (86b167c) 93.65% compared to head (6186b6c) 93.66%.

❗ Current head 6186b6c differs from pull request most recent head 71c4622. Consider uploading reports for the commit 71c4622 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #194      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.65%   93.66%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines        2945     2999      +54     
==========================================
+ Hits         2758     2809      +51     
- Misses        187      190       +3     
Files Coverage Δ
torchopt/alias/sgd.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
torchopt/alias/utils.py 98.89% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
torchopt/linalg/cg.py 98.15% <ø> (ø)
torchopt/linalg/ns.py 41.38% <ø> (ø)
torchopt/transform/add_decayed_weights.py 95.83% <100.00%> (+0.25%) ⬆️
torchopt/transform/scale_by_adadelta.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
torchopt/transform/scale_by_adam.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
torchopt/transform/scale_by_adamax.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
torchopt/transform/scale_by_rms.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
torchopt/transform/scale_by_rss.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 6 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.