Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Less offset indirection [don't merge] #42

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: 0.9.2-mmx
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

leventov
Copy link

Druid tests are run and passed.

It also pulls some commits from druid upstream, happened after last checkout into 0.9.2-mmx branch.

@drcrallen
Copy link

@leventov can you trim this down to only your commit? if we need to merge the druid-io branch into the 0.9.2-mmx one that should be ok to do

…ry granularity / interval is coarser than data (i. e. segment) interval, that is typical for topN queries (BACKEND-319)
@leventov leventov force-pushed the lessOffsetIndirection branch from 75ffb36 to d030c08 Compare September 28, 2016 14:18
@leventov
Copy link
Author

@drcrallen done

@leventov leventov changed the title Less offset indirection Less offset indirection [don't merge] Sep 28, 2016
@leventov
Copy link
Author

However, I think such a performance change, if we are not 100% sure this is a positive change (in this case I'm not sure), shouldn't be merged and tested until we have really precise and stable instruments (perf metrics) to measure impact, because otherwise making such changes in the hope it will improve performance is just wandering in the fog.

We don't have such metrics yet. I'm working on this.

@drcrallen drcrallen force-pushed the 0.9.2-mmx branch 2 times, most recently from 5d8065b to 75a6be0 Compare September 28, 2016 15:06
@drcrallen
Copy link

@leventov sorry, I made a mistake in 0.9.2-mmx and had to rewrite history (I pushed something there I shouldn't have), please rebase.

Again, sorry about that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants