Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: github action for syncing manual test cases with qase #2066

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

yangchiu
Copy link
Member

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#7412

What this PR does / why we need it:

github action for syncing manual test cases with qase

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

@yangchiu yangchiu requested a review from derekbit August 21, 2024 02:42
@yangchiu yangchiu self-assigned this Aug 21, 2024
@yangchiu yangchiu requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2024 02:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@khushboo-rancher khushboo-rancher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Can we separate the logic from yaml file, WDYT?
  2. Have we considered deleting any manual test case PR?

@yangchiu yangchiu force-pushed the qase branch 2 times, most recently from af35523 to 66105c9 Compare August 22, 2024 03:00
@yangchiu
Copy link
Member Author

Require longhorn/bot#29

@yangchiu
Copy link
Member Author

  1. Can we separate the logic from yaml file, WDYT?

Moved logic to longhorn/bot repo: longhorn/bot#29

2. Have we considered deleting any manual test case PR?

Dealt with deleting manual test case in https://github.com/longhorn/bot/pull/29/files#diff-f3c3277164b78a0fc1709361a62f4c9f655edc70477890844e6aff74a705f37fR112

@khushboo-rancher khushboo-rancher merged commit ba5a86a into longhorn:master Aug 27, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants